|
Maintenance Goes a Lot Further Than Equipment by
Robert Apelgren, CMRP, Anteon
Maintenance managers have a lot of responsibility in
making sure that equipment is properly maintained. Equipment is
an asset and carries some kind of monetary value. People on the
other hand are an asset but do not carry a specific monetary
value as an asset. Countless times managers have proclaimed
people are the most valuable asset. Why do we perform
preventative maintenance on equipment and not the people, which
carry the most value and work on the equipment?
The first reason for not performing preventative
maintenance on people is ignorance. A common assumption is that
as long as a person is getting paid and has benefits that
everything is fine. This assumption cannot be further from the
truth. Personal and professional growth are important factors
in the well being of personnel. Everyone wants to succeed
without exception. Employers miss the mark in a lot of cases
because they do not understand or know how to read the signs of
an employee who needs maintenance. In some even scarier cases
employers expect Human Resources to be taking care of the issues
and reading the signs of the employee. That would be like
telling a maintenance technician to monitor equipment condition
from the confines of the office and determine when maintenance
needs to be performed.
The cultural norms of our society have also been an
inhibitor to the preventative maintenance process. Cell phones,
notebooks, and PDA’s have tied us to the workplace 24/7 without
relief. We have created a fear that if someone takes a vacation
they could possibly be replaced upon return because someone else
is willing to work that week. Also, overtime has been a burden
on society by creating an environment that is not healthy for
family life. In the beginning, the extra money looks great and
helps people to live a little better possession wise, but
eventually it breaks down the family unit. There are hidden
quality and productivity issues lurking in the overtime
problem.
Similar to equipment some people need more maintenance than
others. Without the proper maintenance the people will fail.
Some employees need more time off than others, some more pats on
the back, and some employees need promotions. There is not one
universal item that satisfies all employees. There are cases
that employer loyalty is the key attribute that keeps the
employee there. In the last decade there have been major
movements to improve quality of life issues in the workforce.
Movements in the quality of life area can lead to increased
productivity, decreased turnover, increased reliability, and
increased quality.
The supervisors and managers should write themselves a
maintenance schedule for the people who work for them. The six
month or one year reviews are not enough. Management needs to
be out on the floor assessing the condition of the employees and
not just the equipment. Waiting for someone to come forward
with a problem means the failure has already happened. It is
similar to when the bearing temp skyrockets and the bearing
starts to squeal. Assessing the condition of personnel every
six months opens the management up to a whole myriad of
corrective maintenance issues including the fallout of someone
having a poor review. I am amazed with how many technicians
have never been aware of the failure. Kind of like the bearing
failure the equipment doesn’t know it has failed so it keeps
running possibly breaking other items.
The final thought is the proper assessment of the condition of
the personnel. People trust people who are straight forward
about problems. Managers sometimes get bombarded with the
question “How am I doing?” This is like the assembly line that
keeps tripping because of a misaligned photo-eye or limit
switch. If you do not fix the system it is going to keep
tripping. The people asking that question are trying to get
feedback so they can improve. If they are told they are doing
well every time with nothing else they will probably keep doing
the same thing. If there is room for improvement that can be
identified it will probably be too late after telling them
countless times that they are doing well. The small and skinny
of it is that ignoring problems won’t cause them to fix
themselves. Maintenance on personnel is just as important as
the equipment.
Robert Apelgren is a Reliability Engineer with Anteon. He
received his BS in Industrial Technology from Roger Williams
University and an MBA from the University of Phoenix. He is a
Certified Maintenance and Reliability Professional. He has 13
years of maintenance experience as a technician, supervisor,
coordinator, consultant, and trainer.
Contact Information
Robert Apelgren, CMRP
Reliability Engineer
Anteon
Phone: (904)573-7873
Mobile: (904)476-9184
rapelgren@anteon.com
Website: www.anteon.com
|