|
Creating a Safe Work Environment
by Mike Rarrat is a Vice President of Business Development for
Reliability Management Group
(RMG)
Why can’t we create and sustain superior safety performance in
most industries? The answer in my opinion is quite simple. We as
leaders treat safety as a special event or an additional
responsibility for our employees. We as leaders have not made
safety a part of our Work Culture by communicating a clear
vision and clarifying our safety expectations. We as leaders
have failed to define specific roles and responsibilities
related to safety performance for all levels of the
organization. We have not created and communicated a system of
accountability. We have failed to make and keep our commitment
to safety or in other words, we fail to ensure human reliability
and take action when there is a deviation to our safety
performance expectations.
For years, organizations throughout the United States have spent
billions of dollars searching for the silver bullet that can be
shot into their business to create an accident free work
environment. Some organizations opt to spend their dollars
in-search of the cookbook remedy that, if followed will allow
managers and first line supervisors to re-create that illusive
accident free work environment by following step-by-step
instructions. During the past ten plus years, efforts have been
made to involve employees in the improvement of safety
performance by observing the specific behaviors of fellow
employees that can lead to safe or unsafe work practices. This
information is communicated and documented. The documented
information is used to create a database of safe and unsafe
behaviors. The database of information can be used in a problem
solving process to identify specific employee behaviors that
must be modified or identify safety improvements related to
equipment and or procedures that can be implemented to remove
unsafe behaviors.
I have experienced both the “Carrot” and the “Stick” methodology
(positive and negative reinforcement) related to safety
performance. Good safety performance has been recognized through
financial payout, giving away safety products and celebrating
with award banquets. Poor safety performance has been met with
loss of pay, discipline up to and including termination of
employment for some employees. Neither positive nor negative
consequences seemed to have a dramatic impact on improving
long-term safety performance. During the past 25 years in the
power industry I have personally been exposed to at least 12
major safety initiatives. All 12 initiatives have resulted in
limited success. So why don’t these safety initiatives work?
Why can’t we create and sustain superior safety performance in
most industries?
Assessment
What are your organization’s beliefs related to safety? Has the
leadership of the organization communicated a clear vision and
expectations related to safety? Do you have a clear
understanding of how safety performance is measured? Does your
organization have a clear understanding of the consequences
related to safety performance, both the positive and negative?
What are your roles and responsibilities related to safety? What
are the roles and responsibilities of the people who report to
you and do they understand and are they committed to these
responsibilities? The answers to these questions may surprise
you if the responses to these questions are grouped by levels in
your organization.
Most organizations have completed several forms of surveys and
assessments over the past several decades. Some businesses have
developed safety-training programs utilizing this information.
Others have communicated mandates for improvements based on
information obtained from these data rich, information poor
findings. Once again the results of both the training programs
and corporate mandates yield modest, short-term results at best.
So how is the safety performance in your organization? To gain a
true understanding of where you are as an organization related
to the safety continuum, you must strap on your PPE and enter
the work environment, illustrated here by Reliability Management
Group’s (RMG) Work Management Wheel©.
EARLY WORK IDENTIFICATION WILL INCREASE SAFETY
As you wander through your facility, pay close attention to the
basics. What is the overall condition of your plant? Is the
environment clean and well lit? Are spills and leaks evident?
Take note of repair tags or caution tape that may be found. How
long has this condition existed? Be sure to visit your control
centers and gather the data that may be present and document
dates. Have all the deviations from your safety expectation
been captured as identified work? What priority has been
assigned to this type of work? Once you have verified that
unsafe work has been identified it’s time to visit your site
Planning person(s).
PROPER JOB PLANNING WILL INCREASE SAFETY
Ask your planning group to show you the priority work you have
identified. Ask your planning group to show you the job plan on
how this work will be accomplished. The first step in a good
job plan starts with a clear, concise description of the work to
be accomplished. A job plan will identify all hazards associated
with completing the desired task. Lock-out/Tag-out procedures
will be included in the job plan. Proper PPE required to perform
the work will be identified. Special tools and equipment will be
noted. Multi-craft coordination will be communicated. The
correct parts and materials will be verified and staged prior to
the start of work. The correct crew size and number of hours to
complete the job safely are also a requirement of a proper job
plan. How do your job plans compare to these expectations?
WORK SCHEDULING WILL INCREASE SAFETY
The most important step in the scheduling process is to adopt
the discipline to only schedule planned work. In review of the
job planning process listed above, why would any organization
trying to create a safe work environment allow work to be
scheduled and assigned without a proper job plan? Most
organizations have become experts in emergency, reactive and
just in time maintenance. Failure to schedule properly planned
jobs that identify the correct tools and equipment, coordinate
multi-craft work and insure proper equipment isolation that
covers all work groups can and will lead to accidents and
injury.
How is work coordinated and scheduled in your organization?
WORK ACCOMPLISHMENT WILL INCREASE SAFETY
Clear, concise expectations of the work to be accomplished must
be communicated from site leadership and be understood by work
groups prior to the start of all jobs. Job plans must be
reviewed so all safety issues related to the job can be
discussed and clarified with the workforce. Lock/Tag/Try
procedures and all equipment isolation must be reviewed prior to
starting the job to insure a safe work environment at the job
site. The workforce must understand their roles and
responsibilities related to safety such as using the proper
tools, equipment and wearing the proper PPE provided for the
job. Expectations for job status reporting must be communicated
to avoid any conflicts with multi-craft coordination. The
expectation that good housekeeping is part of the work to be
accomplished should be communicated and understood by all
employees.
Have you clearly communicated your expectations to your
employees on accomplishing work?
WORK DOCUMENTATION WILL INCREASE SAFETY
All safety problems or deviations from the job plan while
accomplishing work should be documented. A post review of the
job will help identify unforeseen safety hazards that were
encountered and identify how the safety issues were addressed. A
review and documentation will also help identify special tools,
equipment, parts or PPE that may have been overlooked while
planning the job. The type of repair that was performed and the
condition of the equipment when the job was completed should
also be captured and documented. What type of documentation and
work history is available to help improve safety at your
facility?
WORK ANALYSIS AND MEASUREMENT WILL INCREASE SAFETY
The information gathered during work documentation is worthless
in improving safety unless the information is reviewed, problems
are identified and improvement plans are developed in a timely
manner. The intent of analyzing and measuring safe and unsafe
work performance is to proactively address safety issues
utilizing historical information so future job plans can be
improved. The analysis and measurement process can also provide
data to help an organization move from a reactive to proactive
maintenance philosophy, which will reduce emergency work.
Superior safety performance will only be realized and sustained
through a continuous review and work process improvement.
CONCLUSION
We must get back to the basics. We must make safety an every
day, common occurrence. We must clearly define safety as a
standard step in our daily Work Management process. We must
avoid the temptation of making safety a special event and
instead safety must become the way we work and our way of life.
About the author:
Mike Rarrat is a Vice President of Business Development for
Reliability Management Group (RMG), a process and work
management consulting firm based out of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
RMG specializes in delivering sustainable, bottom line results
for their clients through improvements in reliability, asset
management and defect elimination. While with RMG, Mike has
worked in a variety of industries, including electrical
utilities, refining, chemical and petrochemical. Prior to
joining RMG, Mike worked in the Power Generation industry for 25
years, holding positions in Materials Management, Operations,
Maintenance and as Site Manager at MidAmerican Energy’s Louisa
Power Plant.
For more information or assistance in creating and implementing
a safe work culture please contact Reliability Management Group
at 1-952-882-8122 or on the web at
www.rmgmpls.com
|