What improvements
is your organization pursuing? It is likely that your
management has spent a lot of time reviewing best practices and
evaluating which ones can provide the needed performance
improvements. But has any effort been expended to determine
which of these best practices are “doable” within your
organization? Putting best practices into place is
substantially more difficult than just talking about them. The
reason for this can be tracked back to the readiness of
the organization to change into a high performing entity. While
many individuals within the organization may be ready to make
the change, it will not be sustained and may not even happen at
all without the organizational unit being ready for the change.
In an article
written by MIT System Dynamics Professor John Sterman and Nelson
Repenning, published in the California Management Review in 2001
(“Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems that Never
Happened”), the authors discuss the impact that the structure of
a system has on the behaviors within that system. The actions
of individuals within a system cannot overcome the fundamental
nature of that system. As stated by Sterman and Repenning:
The attribution of
a problem to the characteristics – and character flaws – of
individuals in a system rather than to the system in which they
find themselves is so pervasive that psychologists call it the
“fundamental attribution error”
How do you assess
your organization’s readiness for change?
In the early 1990’s, a System Dynamics computer
model was created to make sense of extensive benchmark data that
had been gathered by DuPont.
While
providing key
insights for the group who developed the model, it was a
completely ineffective tool for sharing those insights with
others in the organization. The desire to share these insights
widely across the organization led to the development of the
first and second versions of The Manufacturing Game®.
Over the last twelve years, as a result of the broad experience
gained working in a variety of industries, we have made
significant enhancements to the original model. By capturing the
lessons from these experiences, we have made both the model and
the workshop more robust. The model has recently been modified
so that it can be used to help companies determine their
readiness to change. An assessment can help a company determine
which Stable Domain is achievable by their organization. While
most people would like to achieve the Precision Domain or
consider themselves to be pushing toward World Class, they might
discover that their organization is only ready to go to the
Planned Domain and that they will need to have other initiatives
and change the mind set of their people to achieve higher
domains.
Find key leverage
points through an assessment.
There are various
key leverage points within the best practices that are unique
for each organization. Examining data from a specific site such
as performance differences in practices, existing management
policies and change initiatives effecting the site will help to
identify those key leverage points. This examination can provide
insights about where to find the best opportunities to gain
leverage for lasting change. Although there are many leverage
points, the key is in deciding which can have the highest value
for a given organization with their current state. By making
this determination up front, the trial and error approach to
change can be avoided.
A good assessment
predicts the impact that the various practices and strategies
will have on the level of performance of your organization. It
will provide information needed to determine not only what level
of performance your organization can achieve, but also, how far
and how fast your organization can accomplish that change. A
good assessment will clearly and concretely identify your site’s
high leverage points and also predict which Stable Domain is
achievable by your organization. The insights gained from an
assessment will provide the information necessary to develop a
very concrete plan of action that takes advantage of high
leverage points and eliminates low leverage activities.
The level of
ownership felt by employees is a key factor in achieving the
performance of the best practice companies. Our definition of
ownership is “people’s willingness to initiate and participate
in proactive improvements”. All of the technical tools to
increase reliability alone do not help the reliability of the
plant. It is the use of these tools by the employees that
achieves the results. If no one has the will to use the tools
on a daily basis, reliability will decrease. Preventive
Maintenance and Predictive Maintenance are great tools, but
these and other Best Practices assume, as pointed out by W.
Edwards Deming, that work systems are uniform and under
control. We have found that the defect elimination culture
creates that type of control in the minds of the employees if a
systems approach is taken. The use of cross-functional teams
seems to create the total systems perspective needed. Ownership
involves three elements: responsibility, authority, and
accountability. Defect elimination Action Teams are a great way
to instill this important factor into an organization.
“Company
culture” and “culture change” have become tainted words in
today’s vocabulary. Often because the terms have been used to
force change that did not have an apparent business focus. A
definition of “culture” found in the dictionary is:
Culture is the intangible set of beliefs,
behaviors, and assumptions that guide people’s day-to-day
activities.
With this definition in mind, it is easy to
understand that if the level of employee ownership is low, the
day-to-day activities of these employees can be unfocused,
uninspired and nonproductive.
Use metrics to
monitor progress.
As a company begins implementing
the identified key leverage points to improve organizational
performance it is just as important to consider the metrics that
will be used to gauge progress. Without some measurable
framework to note the improvements being made, it would be easy
to lose heart, and let the improvement effort die. We have found
that the framework of Goals, Means and Consequences is valuable
in evaluating the use
of metrics to monitor progress in achieving the sought after
best practices along with a higher domain. In general
organizations get confused about which metric to drive. As your
journey in the improvement effort is undertaken, it is important
that the metrics used change as you begin to make progress. In
the beginning of an improvement process, it is important to
clearly state the goals. People must see these goals and
understand them in order to also see the value of the means and
create the right expectation for the consequence variables.
The figure below depicts the relationship of the
three categories. In the Precision Domain, the level of
attention to detail can only be motivated by service to a noble
goal.
The
means metric is used to adjust the process to achieve the goals.
These metrics need to change as the organization approaches
different domains.
For example, a priority system is very important in the Reactive
Domain because the failures are random, and it is important to
choose the best leverage jobs to work on when the work peaks. It
also provides a way to keep track of the backlog of things that
need to be done when the workload wanes. Some idea of the goal
measurement for reactive maintenance, such as uptime of
equipment, helps focus the effort, as long as you are in the
Reactive or Planned Domain as an organization. A better metric
for evaluating the Precision Domain is the number of work
orders, because that correlates with the number of defects being
generated. Another important factor is the form of the metrics.
It is better to measure the rate of the work instead of the
static portion such as the stock of backlog. The improvement
will be detected in the trend of a flow much faster than the
change in the backlog. The backlog integrates the history of the
flow but not the trend. Backlogs are useful in determining the
need for more resources but do not depict the dynamics of the
organization. An organization that is the poorest in its
industry can be at the top in a couple of years if they get on a
10% learning curve.

In summary, it
is important to keep in mind the value of assessing your
organization to discover the high leverage point best practices.
Understand that the system or organization is the focus of the
change. You must establish a set of metrics understood by the
employees to determine the progress that is being made. With
these elements in mind, your site is in a position to move to a
higher domain, and in the process, become the organization it is
capable of being.
|