RCFA – A Great Tool, But How Proactive Is It?
In the reliability improvement field, we often come across organizations that talk about being proactive, but then rely on root cause failure analysis (RCFA) as a primary method for improving their maintenance programs. This is not to say that RCFA is not an important analytical tool, but if RCFA is driving improvement, it’s important to recognize that a failure must have already occurred! To be truly proactive, it is critical to examine equipment before it fails using failure mode identification techniques like RCM and FMEA. A common second mistake is that companies relying on RCFA will then apply the findings to all similar assets, regardless of operating context. This can drive costs up needlessly and reduce management’s belief in your reliability efforts.
Tip Provided by:Adam Grahn - Principal, Business Development
The Asset Performance Group Inc. (APG)
- Developing Asset Management Plans
- The Art of Balance
- Safety and Reliability Concepts
- Lean Thinking MRO
- Machinery Fault Diagnosis
- Safety in the CMMS Cloud
- The Plant Maintenance Program
- Safety Devices Which 33% Are You?
- Rid Yourself of Routine Oil Changes
- Pump Technology Balancing Tradition & Innovation
- The 5S Method of Improvement - Enhancing Safety, Productivity and Culture
- Benchmarking, Best Practices, Standardization… Development or Envelopment?
- Electric Motor Bearing Greasing Basics (8)
- How Do Continuous Improvement Management Philosophies Relate to the Maintenance Function? (2)
- Maintenance of Hydraulic Systems (3)
- Resonance - Machinery Rock & Roll
- Asset Management: concepts and practices (8)
- Aerial Infrared – An Asset Management Tool for District Heating System Operators
- Reliabilityweb.com 100 Top Web Sites
- Cintas Discovers Keys to Organizational Change Through CMMS Rollout (2)