Visite nuestro sitio en Español: Confiabilidad.net    RSS | Contact

Understanding Hidden Failures, the Saga of the Parachute

May 21, 2012
(Reliability-Centered Maintenance)

In RCM2, a hidden failure is a functional failure that on its own will not become evident to the operating crew under normal circumstances. If the functional failure is not “hidden”, then the failure would be considered “evident”. For each of the scenarios below, is the failure of the parachute hidden or evident?

  1. The pilot of a military training plane bails out when the plane catches fire utilizing a parachute provided for the purpose. The chute rips apart at the seams on opening due to the stitching being exposed to a corrosive environment for the last year.
  2. A crew member from a military cargo plane is an avid skydiver. With her parachute in the shop for repairs, she “borrows” one from the cargo plane. When the skydiver deploys it, the chute fails to open on the weekend jump.

In Scenario 1, the failure is hidden as the parachute is a protective device designed to be capable of safely returning the pilot to the ground in the event the plane is unable to do so. Under normal circumstances, the need would not exist to bail out of good airplane unless it failed in some way first. To overcome the potential multiple failure, a failure finding approach should be applied to the parachute.

In Scenario 2, the failure is evident as it is normal for a skydiver to use the parachute to return to the ground. The failure on its own would definitely be evident to the skydiver when the chute failed to open.

When considering protective devices and hidden failures, it may surprise you to learn that upwards of 20% of your protective devices are already in the failed state and you don’t know it. To learn more about hidden failures and protective devices, click here.

Tip provided by: Jeff Shiver, CMRP, CPMM, RCM2 Practitioner, People and Processes, Inc.

People and Processes Logo

Previous tip: Monitoring Reciprocating Compressors
Next tip: Definition: Splash Lubrication

« Back to all maintenance tips

Comments (1)

  • Scenario 1 makes good sense but I do not agree with the interpretation of scenario 2. In this case the evident failure is with her own parachute. This is in the shop for repairs, presumably after a problem becoming evident after inspection or similar fault finding procedure which must have been followed for a parachute which is "intended for use". The parachute that she borrowed is in the same category as that in the first scenario. It is only intended as an emergency measure. Of course the sky diver would be OK since she would be carrying a reserve chute for just these reasons!

    1) Posted 5:59 am, 13 June 2012 by R Collinson

Have your say

Comments are moderated prior to publication.
Please fill out the fields below.
Email addresses will never be published.

Comment guidelines

You can use basic HTML (a, strong, em, blockquote).
Links automatically use the nofollow attribute.
Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted.

Knowledge Base Articles
Advertisement