Why: Design reviews should demonstrate by calculation or through the use of models and reliability tools that the system is capable of achieving the design objects rather than making a giant leap of faith that all will be well and good.

When: Design reviews for reliability should be a part of the design process starting with conceptual designs and ending when the drawings are revised for the as-built system.

Where: This is a logical extension of the design process to show me rather than tell me how the system will function and is performed as a portion of the up-front design by the numbers process.

These definitions are written by H. Paul Barringer and are also posted on his web site at www.barringer1.com

Return to Reliability Tools

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
The Three Laws of Preventive Maintenance

The Three Laws of Preventive Maintenance

Each preventive maintenance task in an Uptime Elements developed Reliability Strategy is generated for an identifiable and explicit reason

Digital Built America: Smarter, More Sustainable and Resilient

Digital Built America: Smarter, More Sustainable and Resilient

Building back better means transitioning the current infrastructure to smarter, more sustainable forms of development to safeguard the country’s future.

DIPF Curve and RCM Failure Patterns

Predictive Maintenance Deja Vu All Over Again

Compared to total asset failures, what percentage of asset failures can be "reliably predicted" with predictive maintenance?