Why: The extremes of operating conditions such as high power levels, high temperatures, high vibration levels, etc. produce failures not anticipated from testing at nominal conditions. Generally ESS is directly applicable and interpreted to be applicable to electrical/electronic equipment, however the same issues/concepts apply to mechanical equipment when the stressing conditions are loads/pressures/temperatures/vibrations/thermal shocks/etc., so as for all reliability issues-think broadly!

When: When acquiring data, the tests are done upfront of production. When controlling early failures that would be discovered by the end user, these test are done as a portion of the production process to eliminate week units to control warranty costs and improve customer satisfactions

Where: Some tests are conducted in the laboratory for quick results and then the data is used to control product testing/release for the purpose of limiting costs and preventing the loss of customers from unsatisfactory performance in the field.

These definitions are written by H. Paul Barringer and are also posted on his web site at www.barringer1.com

Return to Reliability Tools

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
The Three Laws of Preventive Maintenance

The Three Laws of Preventive Maintenance

Each preventive maintenance task in an Uptime Elements developed Reliability Strategy is generated for an identifiable and explicit reason

Digital Built America: Smarter, More Sustainable and Resilient

Digital Built America: Smarter, More Sustainable and Resilient

Building back better means transitioning the current infrastructure to smarter, more sustainable forms of development to safeguard the country’s future.

DIPF Curve and RCM Failure Patterns

Predictive Maintenance Deja Vu All Over Again

Compared to total asset failures, what percentage of asset failures can be "reliably predicted" with predictive maintenance?