Figure 1 - Multiple Wires Making up one conductor

Figure 1: Multiple Wires Making Up One Conductor

The Stator Connection Testing

The highest quality connections involve brazing the conductors together in order to make a solid, low resistance connection. However, mistakes in brazing will cause broken wires or a loose connection. During the rewind process, the connections are first made, then insulated and tied down. Figure 2 shows a completed winding set up for power testing. Normally, during this test, power is supplied to the winding and a ball bearing or dummy rotor is used to ensure that there is proper rotation. If a coil or connection is reversed, then the bearing or rotor will stop or reverse.

Figure 2 - Motor Set Up for Power Test

Figure 2: Motor Set Up for Power Test

The second part of the power test is to increase voltage until the current matches the nameplate current. This is applied until the winding and stator core begins to heat and the operator checks for hot or cold spots on the winding or core.

Infrared Analysis of Test

Another method of evaluating the condition of the winding can be performed. In this test, prior to insulating the connections, they are left exposed and the power applied to nameplate value. At that point, infrared images are taken and the connections evaluated, they should be the same, or lower, temperature than the winding end-turns.

An additional test can be performed, using this method, after the winding is completed and before it is varnish insulated. With the stator set up as shown in Figure 2, power is applied up to the nameplate current rating. The winding is then evaluated and any hot spots are evaluated further, as shown in Figures 3 to 7. This data was taken at Dreisilker Electric Motors, Inc. (http://www.dreisilker.com) as part of a study on motor repair.

Figure 3 - Stator Winding and Connection as it Begins to Heat

Figure 3: Stator Winding and Connection as it Begins to Heat

Figure 4 - Stator Winding Heating (1)

Figure 4: Stator Winding Heating (1)

Figure 5 - Stator Winding Heating (2)

Figure 5: Stator Winding Heating (2)

Figure 6 - Stator Winding Heating (3)

Figure 6: Stator Winding Heating (3)

Figure 7 - Stator Winding Heating (4)

Figure 7: Stator Winding Heating (4)

In Figures 3 through 7, taken with a Fluke Ti30 Thermal Imager (http://www.fluke.com), the connection points were good. Additionally, the winding had passed when the connections were exposed.

Conclusion

Loose winding connections will generate heat based upon I2R losses. As part of a final test, infrared can be performed before the connections are insulated, then after. Hot spots in the windings or connections can be investigated and repaired prior to varnishing, reducing potential warranty issues. The time to perform the test is negligible as the power testing is normally performed as part of a rewind quality control step.

Bio:

Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP, is the President of SUCCESS by DESIGN, a reliability and maintenance services consultant and publisher, and the Founding Executive Director of the Institute of Electrical Motor Diagnostics, Inc. He has over 20 years in the energy, reliability and maintenance industries with experience from the shop floor to academia and manufacturing to military. Dr. Penrose's personal clients include the UAW/GM Worldwide Facilities Group for all GM facilities energy and maintenance best practices, US Steel motor system maintenance and management programs, Amtrak electrical reliability and Reliability Center, Inc. as their electrical scene investigator and trainer. In the past, Dr. Penrose worked as an electric motor repair journeyman, field service manager, Adjunct Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Senior Research Engineer at the UIC Energy Resources Center, General Manager of an electrical motor diagnostics instrument vendor, Vice President of a US Military R&M consulting firm and President of an industrial R&M consulting firm. He has repaired, troubleshot, designed, installed or researched a great many technologies that have been, or will be, introduced into industry, including being involved in the reliability investigation of Left Ventricle Heart Device motors and design improvements in association with the University of Virginia. He has coordinated US Department of Energy and Utility projects including the industry-funded modifications of the US DOE's MotorMaster Plus software and the development of the Pacific Gas & Electric Motor System Performance Analysis Tool project. Dr. Penrose's UAW/GM WFG team won the 2006 Quality Network Planned Maintenance ‘People Make Quality Happen' award for their work in improving the steam systems within General Motors facilities by adopting the US Department of Energy tools and best practices. Dr. Penrose is a past Chair of the Chicago Section of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and presently leads several IEEE Standards Authority efforts and is a USA representative to ISO for industrial reliability standards. He is a member of the Vibration Institute, Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding Association, International Maintenance Institute, Society of Maintenance and Reliability Professionals, NETA and a Life Member of MENSA. He has numerous articles, books and professional papers published in a number of industrial topics and is a US Department of Energy MotorMaster Certified Professional as well as a trained vibration analyst, infrared analyst and motor diagnostics professional.

Questions concerning this article can be emailed to Dr. Penrose via howard@motordoc.net or view the SUCCESS by DESIGN website at http://www.motordoc.net

Howard W Penrose, Ph.D.

Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP, is the President of MotorDoc LLC, the Executive Vice President of MotorSight Corp, Treasurer of SMRP and Web Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Society. Howard has over 30 years in the electric machinery repair, design, materials, energy and systems industry and is an award-winning author. www.motordoc.com

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.