The service inspector asked to have the system pressurized with compressed air. The test pressure was set at between 25 to 30 psi. The inspector used an ultrasound detection instrument that sensed ultrasound emissions produced by a leak. The instrument then translated these sounds down from the high frequency range. Through headphones supplied with the instrument, the inspector was able to hear the low frequency or "audible" range where the sounds were coming from and see intensity increments via a display panel on the back of the instrument.

While scanning the first section with this ultrasonic instrument, the inspector noted that a 250 lb steam line close by was creating excessively loud ultrasound. Since it was anticipated that the leak sound would have to penetrate through the insulation and would be substantially lower in volume than the steam generated noise, the inspector requested that the steam line be temporarily turned off.

After the steam line was shut off, the inspector used a module to sense airborne ultrasounds, referred to as a scanning module, and located three leaks. The leaks were repaired (welded) within a few hours. The inspector then noted a drop of pressure in the system pressure gauge and determined that there were still more leaks to find. He resumed scanning the pipe system with his ultrasound instrument but was unable to identify any more leaks.

Speaking of pressure, the customer was depending on the inspector to find all the leaks before the evening shift began. He asked for permission to make test points in the insulation by perforating the aluminum skin with a sharp screwdriver. Out of necessity, permission was granted. The inspector made a series of strategic perforations on each side of the 8" piping system.

He switched to a module used to inspect structure borne ultrasounds called a stethoscope or "contact" module. This is a module with a solid metal rod on the end that acts as a wave guide to transfer structure borne ultrasounds produced by the leak to the instrument's sensor. He carefully inserted the wave-guide into the holes he fashioned and listened for any increases in the sound. It was not until the inspector came up to an elbow in the system that he heard what he believed was the source of the problem. The insulation was removed and to everyone's relief and the leak was confirmed. The problem became evident.

Although the majority of the system was constructed in 316 stainless steel, the elbow was not. To temporarily fix the leak, soft putty that hardens in less than 10 minutes was fashioned over the leak. It was hypothesized that because the system was pulling vacuum, the putty would be sucked into the leak site just enough to stop the leak. While the system was changed from positive to negative pressure, the inspector made a final scan. Their supposition was correct. All of the leaks had been identified and repaired, and the customer could resume their process.

The inspector has checked back several times and confirmed that the customer was able to run his process for the two weeks necessary to have the part fabricated. For Enercheck Systems, it was just another success story using ultrasound detection equipment to spot leaks. For the customer, it kept order fulfillment on track - potentially saving hundreds of thousands of dollars in downtime.

Article submitted by:

Bruce Gorelick, vice president, Enercheck Systems, Charlotte, N.C., www.enerchecksystems.com
Alan Bandes, vice president marketing, UE Systems, Inc., www.uesystems.com

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Optimizing Value From Physical Assets

There are ever-increasing opportunities to create new and sustainable value in asset-intensive organizations through enhanced use of technology.

Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.