Opportunity 1: Application of Motor Diagnostics for Periodic Testing

In a recent study, 1,054 motors were evaluated with MCA in a marine environment. The motor system owner's previous program involved the use of insulation to ground testing with a pass/fail limit of 1 MegOhm. The selected technology used in the study was an ALL-TEST IV PRO 2000 motor circuit analyzer which obtains data on resistance, impedance, inductance, phase angle, current/frequency response and insulation to ground testing.

During the period of testing, 35 machines were found to have insulation resistance values of ‘0' MegOhms. A total of 398 machines had a variety of potential faults identified as developing winding shorts, winding contamination, poor connections and/or a combination of faults (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Faults and Types Detected

Figure 1: Faults and Types Detected

Of the 35 machines with low insulation resistance values, only one failed during the following eight months. This machine was also identified with developing winding faults. Of the remaining 363 machines, over 20% were identified as having failed over the next eight months. Note that additional machines may have also failed, however the data was limited based upon the accuracy of failure data entered into the associated CMMS software system.

A majority of the 1,054 machines were considered critical, with a number of them including fire pumps. Most of the identified motors were allowed to operate to failure. One of the significant issues identified in this study was that the application followed along with the expected 1 in 4 to 1 in 6 motors being identified with potential faults as identified in the 2003 "Motor Diagnostics and Motor Health Study."

Opportunity 2: Application of Motor Diagnostics for Predictive Maintenance

In 1996, a field service company initiated a motor diagnostics program utilizing an MCA device. The results were dramatic in that the number of annual motor repairs dropped by over 33% while production remained constant (Figure 2). The impact was an improvement in equipment availability and planned outage overhauls (the correct machines were removed for attention). There was also a direct reduction in emergency work orders by over 66%, which directly translated into a reduction in maintenance overtime costs and allowing a higher rate of completed PM's.

Figure 2: Motor Failures 1996 to 2003

Figure 2: Motor Failures 1996 to 2003

Program started in 1996 and eliminated at end of 2001

Notably, in this study, was the fact that electric motor repairs were not eliminated However, the severity of the remaining repairs were reduced.

Following several years of success (1996 to 2001), new management made the decision to eliminate the motor diagnostic program. In less than 18 months, the conditions that existed prior to the application of the program returned. The result was a dramatic increase in maintenance costs associated with the electric motors, increased unplanned downtime, additional overtime man-hours and emergency work orders.

Figure 3: % Emergency Calls Related to Motors

Figure 3: % Emergency Calls Related to Motors

Opportunity 3: The Application of Motor Diagnostics for Condition Monitoring

A Midwestern transmission manufacturing facility with an existing, and successful, infrared, ultrasonics and vibration program implemented Motor Circuit Analysis to support the program. The results were fairly dramatic within the first quarter of implementation in 2002:

* Reduction in troubleshooting time of over 50%
* Reduction of ‘no problem found' reports, for rotating machines sent to repair shops, by over 80%
* Reduction of repair costs for rotating machines by over 50%, when repairs were proactive. For example: Winding contamination resulting in clean-dip-and-bake versus allowing servo motors to run to failure, resulting in rewind.
* Reduction in motor system life-cycle clost of about 35%

Average maintenance man-hour savings for the first three quarters of 2002 were $30,000 per quarter. Immediately following the implementation of the motor diagnostics program in the middle of the third quarter of 2002, the amount increased to $300,000 per month, not including any production or other cost avoidance.

Conclusion

The implementation of an Electrical Motor Diagnostics program, and attention to the health of your motor system, will have immediate and significant impact on your maintenance program and the profitability of your company. As will be demonstrated in future articles, the implementation of an electric motor system maintenance and management program can have even more dramatic effects.

Richard Borge
Performance Evaluation has been testing electrical equipment for the past 22 years with an assortment of test equipment. Performance has used both static and dynamic tests to help prevent unscheduled downtime. The testing inludes AC/ DC motors of all sizes and transformers. Performance contact is Richard Borge, www.performancetdr.com, 888-484-7564, perfeval@aol.com and 973-661-4281 (fax).

Howard W Penrose, Ph.D. is the President of SUCCESS by DESIGN, a reliability and maintenance consulting, publishing and training firm. Dr Penrose has over 20 years experience in the electrical maintenance and reliability field. He is the Executive Director of the Institute of Electrical Motor Diagnostics (IEMD.org). Howard can be reached at howard@motordoc.net

Howard W Penrose, Ph.D.

Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP, is the President of MotorDoc LLC, the Executive Vice President of MotorSight Corp, Treasurer of SMRP and Web Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Society. Howard has over 30 years in the electric machinery repair, design, materials, energy and systems industry and is an award-winning author. www.motordoc.com

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.

OEM recommended maintenance plans

One-third of CEO Terrence O'Hanlon's colleagues think so - at least as a starting point. What do you have to say?