Hallsta Paper Mill has worked actively with condition monitoring for many years, and its maintenance staff is well acquainted with the problems concerning condition measurement at low speeds. Low speed applications produce signals with low energy content. This makes the signals difficult to measure, often yielding unsatisfactory measuring results. Strong signals caused by factors other than damage phenomena have tended to "override" the weaker signals which indicate bearing damage.

When Hallsta Paper Mill was given the chance to test run SPMHD, it was seen as an interesting opportunity to further optimize operations. Since SPMHD is particularly well suited for measurement on low speed applications, four twin wire presses were selected as suitable objects for test measurements. The twin wire presses run at 10 to 15 rpm in a harsh environment, where bearings and other machine parts are exposed to high degrees of moisture and running water. Per Ljungström, responsible for preventive maintenance at Hallsta: "When the twin wire presses do not work properly, the negative impact on the process is significant. Over the years, we have tried a number of different measuring techniques to keep the presses running in an optimal way, but before SPMHD, no method has given satisfactory results."

Per Ljungström

Preventive Maintenance engineer Per Ljungström of Hallsta Paper mill shows one of the damaged bearings.

SPMHD is a development of the original True SPM method for shock pulse measurement on rotating machinery. Advanced digital technology makes SPMHD extremely sensitive. Hence, the method can capture and enhance the weak signals and provide very high signal quality. For a full picture of bearing condition, the measuring cycle is based on number of revolutions rather than time. This maximizes the chances of capturing relevant signals during the course of one measuring cycle. By adjusting the sampling frequency to rpm, spectrums are clear and concise also when measuring cycles are long.

Fig 2

Close-up of damaged bearing (inner race crack with deep spallings).

Highly detailed results in spectrums and time signals make them excellent tools for analysis, where the source of the signal is simple to identify because every component has its own, distinct damage signature. The time signals are easily interpreted, making it easy to determine the type and extent of the damage.
SPMHD also generates two scalar values, HDm and HDc. HDm represents the highest value measured during the measuring cycle, while HDc is a measure of bearing lubrication condition. Both values are suitable as the basis for setting alarm limits, regardless of machine type. Automatic evaluation of measuring results, presented on a green - yellow - red scale, provides a quick overview of machine condition.

Fig 3

Time signal HD three and a half months before bearing replacement, showing typical pattern from an inner race damage (crack). The speed is 10.7 rpm.

"Among all the measuring techniques we have tested, SPMHD is the first one able to indicate developing bearing damage. Thanks to the SPMHD readings, we have been able to see months ahead that the lifetime of a particular bearing is nearing its end. A forewarning time of up to six months has given us plenty of time to plan our bearing replacements. It has saved us hundreds of man hours", says Per Ljungström. "To date, we have detected six bearing damages. In rough numbers, we have saved about 7,000 EUR per bearing replacement on working hours alone because we have been able to do the necessary replacements during planned stops, rather than running the machine till breakdown. On top of that, there are costs for extra material and quality losses incurred by deteriorating running condition and breakdowns."

Article by Gunnar Runesjö
SPM Instrument AB

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
Three Things You Need to Know About Criticality Analysis

When it comes to criticality analysis, there are three key factors must be emphasized.

Turning the Oil Tanker

This article highlights the hidden trap of performance management systems.

Optimizing Value From Physical Assets

There are ever-increasing opportunities to create new and sustainable value in asset-intensive organizations through enhanced use of technology.

Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.