FREE copy of the Uptime Elements Implementation Guide once you subscribe to Reliability Weekly

The authors, Armando B. Corripio, Ph.D., and Michael Newell, drew upon their project management experiences at major oil refineries to move away from the more academic approach of the two previous editions, and more simply explain how to improve control performance.

For example, the authors concentrate on just two rules for tuning-one that works best for common loops and the other for dead-time dominated loops.

Dr. Corripio, Professor Emeritus in chemical engineering at Louisiana State University (LSU), says that a more simplified explanation of tuning makes it easier to master today’s fundamental control techniques.

“By being less academic in approach, and removing a lot of the mathematical terminology, we’re able to improve understanding of how modern control systems work and help technicians better apply what they’re learning in the workplace,” he points out.

For instance, the third edition:

  • Eliminates references to first- and second-order models since these terms are highly mathematical and reduce appreciation for the usefulness of the models.
  • Removes the distinction between series and parallel proportional-integral-derivative controllers (PIDs) since most modern installations use the series version and there is little difference between the tuning of the two versions.
  • Relies on a single set of tuning strategies: the quarter-decay-ratio (QDR) formulas slightly modified by the Internal Model Control (IMC) rules for certain process characteristics.

Corripio says the project management experience the authors gained at oil refineries gave them valuable insights and exposure to real-world issues and dynamics.

“I became better able to address a non-academic audience,” he relates. “When I co-wrote the first two editions, I was a professor and made much more of an academic mindset and perspective.”

Also unique to the third edition are:

  • A chapter on auto-tuning software, a feature of most modern control systems that the authors contend greatly simplifies the acquisition of process data for effective tuning.  During their work at oil refineries, the authors utilized auto-tuning as a reference to guide selection of final tuning parameter for the controllers, and found it less disruptive than relying on manual processes.
  • A thorough explanation of the control strategies of cascade, feedforward and decoupling-all of which are demonstrated with simulation examples.

All of the example responses were generated using simulation software to illustrate the tuning and show the differences of:

  • Tuning controllable versus dead-time dominated loops
  • Averaging versus tight level control
  • Cascade control versus simple feedback control of a jacketed chemical reactor
  • Feedforward control versus simple feedback control
  • Decoupler control versus simple feedback control of a blender

To purchase the third edition of Tuning of Industrial Control Systems, click here.

About the Authors
Dr. Corripio and Newell are long-time colleagues who have worked together on a variety of optimization and tuning projects for real-world implementation.

Dr. Corripio is Professor Emeritus and Adjoint Professor within the Gordon A. & Mary Cain Department of Chemical Engineering at LSU. Specializing in automatic process control, computer simulation, computer-aided process design and engineering economics, he has served as a consultant to many leading companies, including Polaris Engineering, ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Dow Chemical USA, IBM Brazil, ICI Americas, Batelle Columbus Laboratories, Bechtel Incorporated, PPG and Olin Corporation.

Dr. Corripio’s academic research focuses in particular on computer-aided process design, automatic control theory and computer-integrated manufacturing. Over the years, his research has been funded by a variety of organizations, including TDA Research, the Louisiana Board of Regents, EXXON Foundation, EXXON Chemical Americas, IBM Corporation, BASF Corporation and LSU Energy Research Center.

Prior to joining the LSU Department of Chemical Engineering in 1968, Dr. Corripio served as a development engineer and control systems engineer at Dow Chemical Company. His bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering, master’s degree in chemical engineering and doctorate degree were all earned from LSU. He has received numerous awards and contributed to a wide range of publications and research projects throughout his career.

Newell is an Automation Designer at Polaris Engineering Inc., a multi-discipline full-service engineering and design services company located in Lake Charles, Louisiana. Prior to joining Polaris Engineering in December 2006, Newell spent 10 years as an Automation Administrator at Calcasieu Refining. Newell holds a Level III Certified Control Systems Technician® (CCST®) certification through ISA. He received a degree in electronic communications from Sowela Institute of Technology in 1988. Newell teaches instrumentation and automation on a part-time basis as an adjunct instructor at Louisiana Technical College in Lake Charles.

About ISA
Founded in 1945, the International Society of Automation is a leading, global, nonprofit organization that is setting the standard for automation by helping over 30,000 worldwide members and other professionals solve difficult technical problems, while enhancing their leadership and personal career capabilities. Based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, ISA develops standards; certifies industry professionals; provides education and training; publishes books and technical articles; and hosts conferences and exhibitions for automation professionals. ISA is the founding sponsor of The Automation Federation.

Upcoming Events

August 8 - August 10, 2023

Maximo World 2023

View all Events
80% of newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
Defect Elimination in the context of Uptime Elements

Defect Elimination means a lot of things to a lot of people. Uptime Elements offers a specific context for defect elimination [DE] as a success factor on the reliability journey [RJ].

Internet of Things Vendors Disrupting the Asset Condition Management Domain at IMC-2022

Internet of Things Vendors Disrupting the Asset Condition Management Domain at IMC-2022 The 36th International Maintenance Conference collocated with the RELIABILITY 4.0 Digital Transformation Conference [East]

Asset Management Technology

The aim of the Asset Management technology domain is to assure that IT/OT systems are focused on creating the value from the assets and that the business can deliver to achieve organizational objectives as informed by risk.


TRIRIGAWORLD AWARDS honors excellence in space optimization and facility management, A event to further advance asset management

IMC-2022 Who's Who: The World's Best Run Companies

The International Maintenance Conference (IMC) provides a fresh, positive community-based curated experience to gain knowledge and a positive perspective for advancing reliability and asset management through people, their managers, the strategy, the processes, the data and the technology. The world’s best-run companies are connecting the workforce, management, assets and data to automate asset knowledge that can be leveraged for huge beneficial decisions.

Uptime Elements Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Analysis is a problem solving method. Professionals who are competent in Root Cause Analysis for problem solving are in high demand.

Reliability Risk Meter

The asset is not concerned with the management decision. The asset responds to physics

Why Reliability Leadership?

If you do not manage reliability culture, it manages you, and you may not even be aware of the extent to which this is happening!

Asset Condition Management versus Asset Health Index

Confusion abounds in language. Have you thought through the constraints of using the language of Asset Health?

Seven Chakras of Asset Management by Terrence O'Hanlon

The seven major asset management chakras run cross-functionally from the specification and design of assets through the asset lifecycle to the decommissioning and disposal of the asset connected through technology