A failure in any part of Arnold’s cooling water system can result in lost test time, program delays and considerable cost overruns.

Approximately five years ago, inspections conducted on the eight pumps at the Secondary Pumping Station (SPS) revealed significant wear, beyond what scheduled and condition-based preventive maintenance could address.

“These pumps were originally installed in 1950,” said Jeff Quattlebaum, the cooling water systems engineer with ATA’s reliability engineering branch.

It helps to understand how the entire system works. The base’s Primary Pumping Station draws water four miles from Woods Reservoir to fill a 56 million gallon capacity secondary reservoir. Then the Secondary Pumping Station is used to pull water from this source and routes it to and from all of the testing facilities. The water is eventually filtered of any contaminants and then returned to Woods Reservoir.

Quattlebaum realized a major upgrade to the SPS’s 25,000 gallons-per-minute pumps would be necessary in a couple of years, unless he could find a way to replace the impellers that drive the water through the pumps and throughout the base where it’s needed.

“The impeller itself is the big rotating element that moves the water,” he explained. “Impellers transfer energy from the motor driving the pump to the water being pumped by accelerating the fluid outwards from the center of rotation.”

The company that originally manufactured the pumps at the Secondary Pumping Station was contacted with the aim of having new impellers fabricated to replace the aging ones in the facility’s pumps.

“Probably within three or four months we got the word back that they don’t make those anymore, that model had been discontinued,” Quattlebaum recalled. “They told me, ‘All we can do is sell you a new pump for somewhere between a half and three quarters of a million dollars.’”

As it turned out, not only did the company no longer make the impellers, they no longer had the plans or molds for them either. Finally, he realized that whatever that company had in the way of the original plans or a model of the impeller had ended up at AEDC.

“After a week-long search, we found a crate that hadn’t been opened or touched since 1967. It had a bunch of cardboard and plywood pieces [inside], but these weren’t like a mold you could pour something into, it was the thing they built the mold from.”

Mike Barlow, ATA’s utilities operation manager, said the entire effort to keep the Secondary Pumping Station, which in turn is key to keeping AEDC operational is noteworthy.

“The Secondary Pumping Station (SPS) pump impellers replacement is a prime example of sound service life extension, perseverance and team work,” he said. “The 60-year old pumps and motors at the SPS are well maintained via our preventive maintenance program using proven condition based maintenance strategies and techniques. The right maintenance, combined with impeller replacement, will extend the service life of these eight pumps for another 60 years, or more.”

Barlow had praise for those who took the initiative to ensure the Secondary Pumping Station functions for years to come, especially when the cost avoidance involved is taken into consideration.

“Replacement of the impellers at a cost of approximately $30,000 each is much less than the $750,000 it would cost to replace each of the pumps and motors - a huge savings to AEDC,” Barlow said. “Several years ago, Jeff [Quattlebaum] recognized the value of replacing the impellers.”

Eventually, the original manufacturer decided to fabricate the impellers and this was facilitated by the vintage contents of the crate found in the main warehouse.

Barlow said, “Now all Jeff needed was funding and this is where the team work came into play. He approached his financial contact, Marcheta Darnell, about the need. She worked with her Air Force counterpart, Allen Fleenor, and they were successful at identifying funds to purchase the impellers.”

Last month, the first impeller was built, installed, and successfully checked out, according to Quattlebaum.

Quattlebaum also gave credit to the craft workers who are instrumental in ensuring the whole system functions properly, including the new impeller.

“Our machinists repair, rebuild and perform all of the maintenance to the large pumps on base, including the Primary Pumping Station at Woods Reservoir, Secondary Pumping Station, the cooling towers, return basin and pump at Roland Creek,” said John Richardson, a utilities supervisor with ATA’s test and facility support branch.

Barlow, referring to the recently installed impeller, said, “It works great. Based on that success, seven more impellers are being made. We will install those as each pump is taken out of service for maintenance. This will avoid additional outages and negate the expense of impeller installation.

“Sound maintenance strategies, a lot of perseverance, and a little team work result in an effort that allows AEDC to keep performing its mission for years to come and a great sense of ‘job well done’ for all those involved.”

News Image 1

Aerospace Testing Alliance utility machinists, (left to right) Nat Farrar, Reggie Sizemore and David Stewart set the clearance on the new shaft for the recently fabricated impeller before it was installed at the Secondary Pumping Station (SPS). The 25,000 gallon-per-minute impellers are being replaced to help the efficiency and flow of the cooling water that is used throughout the facilities. These SPS pumps, which weigh between five to six tons each, deliver as much as eight billion gallons of water around the base each year to maintain the proper temperatures for conducting tests of jet engines, aircraft models, rocket motors and other flight systems and components. (Photo by Rick Goodfriend)

News Image 2

ATA Utility Machinist David Stewart operates a large lathe in the Model Shop. He is machining the shaft assembly supporting the recently fabricated impeller for a pump that is located in AEDC’s Secondary Pumping Station.

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.

OEM recommended maintenance plans

One-third of CEO Terrence O'Hanlon's colleagues think so - at least as a starting point. What do you have to say?