Abnormalities are represented by the defects that enter our assets (point P on the P‐F curve) and that will eventually lead to a loss of function from that asset - what we consider a failure (point F on the P‐F curve). 

The True Purpose

The purpose of regularly scheduled proactive inspection activities, such as those performed by operators, is to discover and report these abnormalities as early as possible (to the left hand side of P‐F curve) such that the organization can react with the maximum possible lead time.

If we do not report the abnormalities as soon as they are detected, we are robbing the organization of the time they need to react appropriately to the abnormality.

GPAllied Fig 1

 (The P‐F Curve)

It is of significant importance to note that with the types of inspections performed by operators (generally using the 5‐senses) abnormalities are generally detected well to the right‐hand side of the P‐F curve (very close to failure point), making the formal reporting and response process even more critical.

Formal Reporting vs. Informal Reporting

The question here is the nature of the reporting of the abnormality - with some methods being more effective than others. More often than we care to admit, small problems grow in to catastrophic problems due to the organization's failure to respond properly. Emails, telephone calls, and verbal discussions on the shop floor or in the lunch room are all examples of informal methods of reporting abnormalities. In order to ensure that the organization can respond in a timely manner, it is critical that abnormalities are reported in a formal manner - one that is universally recognized and reacted to by the organization.

Work Requests - The primary method of reporting abnormalities in many organizations is the work request - generally maintained in a database known as the EAM or CMMS. This database allows all member of organization to view and focus on the same list of reported abnormalities. The work request must be the first choice leveraged when reporting abnormalities.

Abnormality Tags - In many organizations, a segment of the personnel lack the training or database access necessary to formally report problems. When this Situation occurs; those personnel must revert to one of the informal methods of reporting abnormalities - leading to lost opportunities and unnecessary failures. As the personnel in this category are generally operators, the abnormality tags used as part of the Operator Care program provide a formal method to formally report an abnormality. In addition, the bright colored tags used in the process provide a visual clue to the existence and location of the abnormality in the workplace.

The Tagging Process - The tags we generally recommend for use consists of a two‐part tag; a front section printed on bright colored paper, a back section printed on an oil and water resistant material such as Tyvek, with carbon paper in between.

When the operator notices an abnormality, they will fill out the top section of the tag, with the information being transferred to the back of the tag via the carbon paper. The element resistant section of the tag (back half) is attached to the equipment near the location of the abnormality, and the top half placed in a centrally located location that is accessible to all operations, maintenance, and supervisory personnel. In those situations where the operators do not have access to the database, we recommend that the supervisor directly responsible for supporting the Operator Care process in each area be tasked with taking the new abnormality tags and creating a corresponding work request in the computer database. This task must be performed on a shift by shift basis.

With the bright color of the tags being used, the visual management aspect of the abnormality reporting process is accentuated. Maintenance personnel are deployed to respond to problems via the established work management process, while operators can oversee and monitor the response to the abnormalities reported by monitoring the tags they have created on their operator care board.

GPAllied Fig 2

This Tool Box Training was written by Mike Gehloff. For more information on the subject of Operator Care please contact him at: mgehloff@gpallied.com.

If you have questions or would like any of the references contact: rsmith@gpallied.com

Tel: +1 843.414.5760


GPAllied Logo

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.