Many organizations use the PM compliance metric as a measurement of their maintenance department’s performance. This metric is often viewed by professionals as a joke because if your PM compliance is high but you continue to have many reliability issues, then the metric has no meaning. There have been organizations with one hundred percent PM compliance, but over ten percent downtime due to reliability issues. Of course, many different issues could contribute to this problem.

  • 30-day PM - Must be completed within three days or PM is “Out of Compliance”
  • “Out of Compliance” means more equipment failures and higher maintenance costs because of variation in execution

Figure 2.1: A simple rule: you cannot perform preventive maintenance that continues to break down; something is wrong.

However, there is a solution to the PM compliance metric to make it believable and truly help you feel confident that it is a true measurement of compliance to your PM program. This solution, which has been tested and proven, requires you to manage your PM program as a controlled experiment. By doing so, you can control reliability with more reliable accuracy.

Now, in order to have a controlled experiment, you must control the variables, such as time. Most PMs are time based, therefore, controlling the variance in your PM schedule would allow you to control reliability better and help you make better decisions.

The 10% rule of preventive maintenance simply states that:

A time-based PM must be accomplished in ten percent of the time frequency or it is out of compliance.

Figure 2.2: This figure illustrates how many organizations perform a monthly (30-day) preventive maintenance strategy applied to a specific component.

Tip from Preventive Maintenance Made Simple by Doug Stangier and Ricky Smith

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
80% of newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.