One of the most common complaints we hear in plants using a computerized maintenance management system is that it is hard to use the computer to find parts in the Storeroom. There are a couple of reasons for this.

The first is that data has not been consistently entered. It is essential that the people who name stock parts are fully trained to use a structured naming process and that they understand how the computer system processes searches. This training is seldom well done, and typical data-entry errors are inconsistent naming, information (such as part numbers) entered in the wrong field, and so on. Commercial "data cleansing" may also make it more difficult to find parts because it removes trade names, which are frequently used by tradesmen and supervisors to describe common components. For a copy of a practical naming standard, contact IDCON.

The second reason for searching difficulty is the almost-universal lack of good search functionality in maintenance computer systems. Many are limited to single-field, single-string searches, and to even navigate to the search entry screen and to enter search information correctly is often beyond the ability of mechanics and other infrequent users.

Before you re-name all your stock or replace your maintenance computer, there are tools available that address these search problems. One is FINDIT, a very fast, powerful and inexpensive search tool that complements your maintenance computer and is as easy to use as Google®. Check it out at www.finditmaintenance.com.

And remember, for process equipment, the best way to find parts is through good spare parts lists (sometimes called "Bills of Materials).

Learn More

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Three Things You Need to Know About Criticality Analysis

When it comes to criticality analysis, there are three key factors must be emphasized.

Turning the Oil Tanker

This article highlights the hidden trap of performance management systems.

Optimizing Value From Physical Assets

There are ever-increasing opportunities to create new and sustainable value in asset-intensive organizations through enhanced use of technology.

Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.