No matter how well your Work Order Failure Hierarchy is researched and constructed, Murphy's Law will get you. There will ALWAYS be some problem or cause, and sometimes remedy, that isn't included in the list.

Example: Overhead Door Controller- Problem: Door won't open/close

Cause: Controller hit by fork truck

Remedy: Replaced Controller - requested installation of bollards

Usually, these are one-off occurrences, but forcing them into an inappropriate ‘bucket’ can skew any attempts at failure analysis. One common solution is to include a Problem or Cause Code for ‘OTHER’ or ‘MISC’. However, human nature and the time constraints of the workplace almost guarantee that a generic selection will be entered inappropriately, if made available. This again skews the results and dilutes the effectiveness of any failure tracking efforts.

These effects can be mitigated somewhat:

  1. Force the generic code to the bottom of the list by modifying the code name and reminding craftsman to enter details: ‘Zcode-enter explanation’. This makes it less likely to be the easiest selection.
  2. If your programming allows, add a Code that automatically opens a text entry box, and won’t accept the selection unless information is entered in the box. This should also be placed at the end of the selection list.
  3. Set up a report for Planners, Supervisors, or even an individual KPI, that counts and allows review of any generic codes used.

Other than that, sorry, but it comes down to enforcement.

NOTE: The same process could be used to reduce the occurrence of unexplained  ‘Complete’ or ‘Done’ entries on Corrective Work Orders.

This tip is by Addie Hostettler of Management Resources Group, Inc.

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.