Many times, your Planners come from the ranks. They could possibly be an hourly craftsperson, or maybe a supervisor. They typically are your most experienced personnel, and rightfully so. This person should have many good qualities such as their years of experience and their overall knowledge of the facility and its operations. They should have good leadership traits. They are respected and reliable, they are good communicators, and they have good multi-skill capabilities. There are many other things that need to be added to this list when considering your choices to fill the role of a Planner / Scheduler. Hopefully you have chosen this person based on strict criteria to include the items above, set forth in advance, to insure that you place the right person in the job.

Once the selection of the Planner has been made, training issues must be considered; what new "tools" will this person be asked to utilize in their new position? They may have set aside their tool box and the actual tools that have made them the craftsperson or Supervisor they are today, and are now being asked to use an entirely new set of tools in an entirely new job function. These new tools probably include a computer, a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS), Microsoft Office Tools, etc. This does not include the fact that they have all new Roles and Responsibilities as Planner / Schedulers. Hopefully you are not placing this person in the new position and doing the unthinkable; asking them to write up their own set of roles and responsibilities! These roles and responsibilities should be drawn up before the selection process ever takes place! Would it not be prudent to have this completed ahead of time in order to help develop the very criteria discussed earlier, which will be one of the major determining factors when choosing the planner?

If there was ever a case to insure that proper training takes place, it is with your Planner / Schedulers. These people are going to be instrumental in your maintenance group becoming effective and efficient. Are you making the statement that you can't afford to perform training? You can't afford not to, especially in the case of your Planners! The whole reason behind implementing Planning and Scheduling is to make your remaining crew more effective in the way they perform maintenance in your facility. Remember, you probably took this person out of your current resources and placed them in this new function. Why then would you not want them to be as effective as possible to prove their value? Here's an example to ask of your group. Can my Planners' type, or are they "pecking" information into the system? The point of instituting the Planning and Scheduling process is to gain greater work utilization from the rest of the maintenance mechanics. Why would you not start this process with the Planning Group? Your Work Utilization effectiveness needs to start here! They need to know how a computer works. They need to know how to type, how to pull data and manipulate it in a database or a spreadsheet, then develop the graphics to reflect the maintenance group's performance. They need to know the CMMS system very close to an Administrator's level. They are going to be your "Power Users" in the CMMS. They need to understand all of its functions, inside and out. Many articles out there will tell you that most systems are only utilized at about 25%-30% of their capability. You need to be willing to provide the training and IT resources to insure these planners are capable of utilizing the CMMS to full capabilities, thus insuring your maintenance functions will be as effective as possible.

When putting the "Scheduler's Cap" on, these people will perform many functions, some of which will be holding daily scheduling and approval meetings, weekly scheduling meetings with production, project planning meetings, etc. Have they been trained on how to properly manage and facilitate a meeting for maximum effectiveness? We would probably all agree that there are too many ineffective meetings going on in our facilities. How many meetings have you attended and asked yourself why you were invited to the meeting? After the meeting, are you still unsure of why you attended or what was accomplished? Training your Planner / Schedulers to be effective facilitators will insure that the Maintenance meetings are short, concise, and the desired outcome is achieved. This will lend credibility to maintenance. The attendees won't mind attending a well structured meeting.

These are just a few of the training issues that should be considered when insuring that the Planner / Schedulers have the tools they now need to be effective in their new jobs. You should not expect them to be effective and efficient if you have not provided them with the means to do so. If this group is properly trained and understands the roles and responsibilities of their new position, they can become a driving force in the success of your Continuous Improvement Process.

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022

6 Signs Your Maintenance Team Needs to Improve Its Safety Culture

When it comes to people and safety in industrial plants, maintenance teams are the ones who are most often in the line of fire and at risk for injury or death.

Making Asset Management Decisions: Caught Between the Push and the Pull

Most senior executives spend years climbing through the operational ranks. In the operational ranks, many transactional decisions are required each day.

Assume the Decision Maker Is Not Stupid to Make Your Communication More Powerful

Many make allowances for decision makers, saying some are “faking it until they make it.” However, this is the wrong default position to take when communicating with decision makers.

Ultrasound for Condition Monitoring and Acoustic Lubrication for Condition-Based Maintenance

With all the hype about acoustic lubrication instruments, you would think these instruments, once turned on, would do the job for you. Far from it!

Maintenance Costs as a Percent of Asset Replacement Value: A Useful Measure?

Someone recently asked for a benchmark for maintenance costs (MC) as a percent of asset replacement value (ARV) for chemical plants, or MC/ARV%.

OEM recommended maintenance plans

One-third of CEO Terrence O'Hanlon's colleagues think so - at least as a starting point. What do you have to say?