Please note manufacturers follow two general strategies for their equipment:

1) build the equipment to avoid failures even though this increases the original capital costs, or
2) build equipment and see the original equipment at a low cost (or even a break-even costs) expecting to make profits with the sale of replacement parts.

Thus for end users of the procured equipment, it is important to know the forecasted failures in the face of suppler protest that "our equipment never fails"-in that case ask to see the sale of spare parts for similar equipment and an estimate of the number of units working to get a crude estimate of the strategy employed by the equipment supplier.

A failure is an event which renders equipment as non-useful for the intended or specified purpose during a designated time interval. The failure can be sudden, partial, or one-shot, intermittent, gradual, complete, or catastrophic. The degree of failure can be degradation or gradual, sudden, or one-shot, from weakness, from imperfections, from misuse, or so forth.

A failure mechanism includes a variety of physical processes which results in failure from chemical, electrical, thermal, or other insults.

Why: Future failures costs money and frequently increase the risk for safety or environmental problems. For manufacturers, the forecasted failures predict impending high costs for warranty expenses which can make/break a company. With good failure forecast, you can anticipate expected failures now (after x-usage), future failures when failed units are not replaced, and future failures when failed units are replaced either with the same failure modes or with differently designed components with different failure detais.

When: This analysis is wisely performed in during the design of the equipment, however many surprises arise from different failure modes build into the assembled product or incurred by not anticipated usage in operations.

Where: Generally this analysis is made during the up-front design effort-with much disbelief the products could be "this bad". Follow-up analysis occurs when unexpected failure modes arise during operation of the equipment which causes loss of service of the equipment and high costs for the end users.

These definitions are written by H. Paul Barringer and are also posted on his web site at www.barringer1.com

Return to Reliability Tools

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
The Three Laws of Preventive Maintenance

The Three Laws of Preventive Maintenance

Each preventive maintenance task in an Uptime Elements developed Reliability Strategy is generated for an identifiable and explicit reason

Digital Built America: Smarter, More Sustainable and Resilient

Digital Built America: Smarter, More Sustainable and Resilient

Building back better means transitioning the current infrastructure to smarter, more sustainable forms of development to safeguard the country’s future.

DIPF Curve and RCM Failure Patterns

Predictive Maintenance Deja Vu All Over Again

Compared to total asset failures, what percentage of asset failures can be "reliably predicted" with predictive maintenance?