FREE copy of the Uptime Elements Implementation Guide once you subscribe to Reliability Weekly

What You Can Do If Your Reliability Program Isn’t Meeting Performance Goals

It’s a typical story.You implement a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) or either an enterprise asset management (EAM) or enterprise resource planning (ERP) system with all the bells and whistles, but it doesn’t deliver a return on investment (ROI).

The system and associated work execution management (WEM) process was meant to improve the performance of assets, but failures keep occurring at a cost to your business.

So, you decide to upgrade the system. It’s a significant investment – perhaps you consolidate disparate systems into one single system, or maybe the cost comes with moving to the Cloud. Still, performance doesn’t improve.

In all this, one thing is missing. Fundamentally, the performance you get from your assets will depend on how you care for them, given the operating environment they are in.

How you care for assets is dictated by the reliability strategies you have in place – that is, the maintenance plans and related content within the EAM system. It doesn’t matter how much you spend on the system; if your master data is lacking, you simply won’t get anywhere. In other words, there’s no point investing in a Ferrari and expecting performance improvements, but then running it on diesel fuel. The Ferrari just can’t do its thing.

Using APM Is a Stepping-Stone, Not a Solution

When organizations find that their investment in WEM and EAM systems don’t improve performance, they often turn to the latest technology to help. Enter asset performance management (APM), which monitors asset condition and health in a bid to prevent unplanned, in-service failures by detecting degradation and allowing a planned intervention to occur.

On the surface, APM appears to tick the right boxes. And it does, but only in the sense that it protects you from unplanned, in-service failures. The APM approach takes a backward look at performance and provides some security against catastrophic failure.

While it helps to detect an impending failure by monitoring asset degradation, APM doesn’t do anything to address the cause of degradation. It won’t help determine how to change the strategy to prevent degradation in the first place or extend the asset life as much as possible.

Again, a reliability strategy is the forward look – it’s designing the appropriate reliability strategy to deliver the performance you require from the assets. And, what’s clear, is if you want to get any return from an EAM system or an APM program, it must be combined with an effective reliability strategy. In fact, it all starts with strategy.

A reliability strategy develops the content that an EAM system needs to be effective and delivers performance that an APM can then monitor and provide some protection around.

A Single Strategy Session Won’t Work

Recognizing the value of strategy, some organizations conduct a formal strategy setting project for some of their assets. While this may be a valuable exercise, generally it is conducted as a finite project with a start and end date. Furthermore, it is typically time-consuming to complete and implement.

Then, once the reliability strategy is implemented, it deteriorates over time. Why? People with good intent, but using no formal review or justification process, change the strategy for the worse. Or, perhaps operating conditions change, yet the strategy is static. Either way, the strategy is no longer aligned to performance goals and you lose control. Failures occur, costs skyrocket and risk increases irrespective of the cloud-based EAM system or APM solution.

The Missing Piece of the Puzzle

What’s missing is asset strategy management (ASM). ASM is a key pillar of an asset management system. It sits alongside EAM and APM, supporting them and enabling them to generate the returns they promise.

With ASM, you build, deploy and govern a reliability strategy with a focus on delivering performance goals at minimum cost and acceptable risk. The reliability strategies are deployed using a digitally connected data set to drive rapid, efficient and effective reliability strategy management over time. It ensures that optimal strategies are deployed on all assets, always.

Strategy no longer deteriorates, meaning the EAM system and WEM process are achieving the performance improvements they promised. APM supports risk management by detecting impending failures and also collects data to support further refinement and evolution of the reliability strategies via the ASM process.

In an organization that has implemented ASM, the WEM process has a direct connection to reliability strategy decision-making:

  • All like assets are connected and improvements are leveraged across the entire organization;
  • All decisions follow the appropriate workflow of review, approval and justification.

ASM provides both a forward-looking performance focus, as well as embedding root cause analysis (RCA) to prevent recurrence should a failure still happen.

Performance starts with strategy. Your reliability strategy is an asset and ASM protects, manages and improves that asset over time.

Jason Apps

Jason Apps, is the CEO of ARMS Reliability, a leading global provider of asset management solutions to some of the world’s largest resource, power and utility companies. Jason has over 20 years of experience in reliability and maintenance engineering.

Upcoming Events

August 8 - August 10, 2023

Maximo World 2023

View all Events
80% of newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
Defect Elimination in the context of Uptime Elements

Defect Elimination means a lot of things to a lot of people. Uptime Elements offers a specific context for defect elimination [DE] as a success factor on the reliability journey [RJ].

Internet of Things Vendors Disrupting the Asset Condition Management Domain at IMC-2022

Internet of Things Vendors Disrupting the Asset Condition Management Domain at IMC-2022 The 36th International Maintenance Conference collocated with the RELIABILITY 4.0 Digital Transformation Conference [East]

Asset Management Technology

The aim of the Asset Management technology domain is to assure that IT/OT systems are focused on creating the value from the assets and that the business can deliver to achieve organizational objectives as informed by risk.


TRIRIGAWORLD AWARDS honors excellence in space optimization and facility management, A event to further advance asset management

IMC-2022 Who's Who: The World's Best Run Companies

The International Maintenance Conference (IMC) provides a fresh, positive community-based curated experience to gain knowledge and a positive perspective for advancing reliability and asset management through people, their managers, the strategy, the processes, the data and the technology. The world’s best-run companies are connecting the workforce, management, assets and data to automate asset knowledge that can be leveraged for huge beneficial decisions.

Uptime Elements Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Analysis is a problem solving method. Professionals who are competent in Root Cause Analysis for problem solving are in high demand.

Reliability Risk Meter

The asset is not concerned with the management decision. The asset responds to physics

Why Reliability Leadership?

If you do not manage reliability culture, it manages you, and you may not even be aware of the extent to which this is happening!

Asset Condition Management versus Asset Health Index

Confusion abounds in language. Have you thought through the constraints of using the language of Asset Health?

Seven Chakras of Asset Management by Terrence O'Hanlon

The seven major asset management chakras run cross-functionally from the specification and design of assets through the asset lifecycle to the decommissioning and disposal of the asset connected through technology