FREE copy of the Uptime Elements Implementation Guide once you subscribe to Reliability Weekly

Beta, like all companies, has areas where they are not satisfied with their current performance. That can create a compelling reason for change within a business unit. Once you’ve identified the reason for change, then a strategy, a set of goals, and the appropriate tools, must be provided and communicated so that people have a clear view of the changes needed, the compelling reasons for the change, the strategy for making the changes, and the ultimate goal or end state. In some cases, Beta is likely to make it clear that not achieving the desired goals is not an option. Exactly how and when they are achieved is an option and is something that requires the support and hard work of everyone. Of course we’ll need to be able to measure against those goals to help assure that we’ve met them, and some suggestions on that are provided below.

A word of caution may be appropriate here. The strategy needs to be reasonably well defined so that it can be understood by the employees and can assure alignment of the organization to the strategy and goals. As we’ve discussed, one of the most important things a leader can do is to align the organization to its strategy and goals. However, it must not be so detailed that it leaves little room for change as we proceed with its implementation, and each step of the change process has a feedback loop that allows for improving the process itself. In his book On War, Von Clausewitz3 observed that developing a strategy without understanding the tactics and capabilities of the troops was folly. So it is with our strategy and goals. We must fully appreciate the need for tactics and understand the capability of our people, and we must be flexible enough to allow modifications to our change management process as we learn. Our people will implement the strategy. They must have a strong hand in developing the day-to-day tactics for its implementation. And, there must be a feedback loop that allows us to accommodate changes to the strategy based on what we learn as we tactically implement those changes.

In setting goals, one of the more common techniques is to use benchmark data to determine gaps in the current performance and then seek to close the gap by achieving “benchmark” performance. Be careful using benchmarks. Using benchmarks is an excellent way to determine the gaps in your performance as they relate to certain measurements. What it often fails to do is provide an understanding of how that performance was achieved, or a process for closing the gaps. It may be that the gap you’re worried about is not one that’s appropriate to be closing at this point in the business. An example might make this more clear. One of the more common “big gaps” in benchmark performance in manufacturing plants is maintenance overtime. A common maintenance overtime rate is 10% to 20%, and sometimes more. So-called benchmark performance is in the range of 3% to 5%. So, it’s easy enough to achieve benchmark performance on overtime. We order people to minimize or eliminate overtime. Nevertheless, the consequence of that may be that work doesn’t get done and products don’t get delivered. It’s better to ask how we can stop the defects that are creating the failures and in turn are creating the need for the overtime. We need to be systems thinkers and understand the consequence of our decisions at a business or operational level as we implement the change process. One of the best sources for understanding the consequences of our decisions is the shop floor. They deal with those consequences every day.

Tip from What Tool? When? A Management Guide for Selecting the Right Improvement Tools by Ron Moore

Upcoming Events

August 8 - August 10, 2023

Maximo World 2023

View all Events
banner
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
DOWNLOAD NOW
Internet of Things Vendors Disrupting the Asset Condition Management Domain at IMC-2022

Internet of Things Vendors Disrupting the Asset Condition Management Domain at IMC-2022 The 36th International Maintenance Conference collocated with the RELIABILITY 4.0 Digital Transformation Conference [East]

Asset Management Technology

The aim of the Asset Management technology domain is to assure that IT/OT systems are focused on creating the value from the assets and that the business can deliver to achieve organizational objectives as informed by risk.

TRIRIGAWORLD AWARDS at MaximoWorld 2022

TRIRIGAWORLD AWARDS honors excellence in space optimization and facility management, A Reliabilityweb.com event to further advance asset management

IMC-2022 Who's Who: The World's Best Run Companies

The International Maintenance Conference (IMC) provides a fresh, positive community-based curated experience to gain knowledge and a positive perspective for advancing reliability and asset management through people, their managers, the strategy, the processes, the data and the technology. The world’s best-run companies are connecting the workforce, management, assets and data to automate asset knowledge that can be leveraged for huge beneficial decisions.

Uptime Elements Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Analysis is a problem solving method. Professionals who are competent in Root Cause Analysis for problem solving are in high demand.

Reliability Risk Meter

The asset is not concerned with the management decision. The asset responds to physics

Why Reliability Leadership?

If you do not manage reliability culture, it manages you, and you may not even be aware of the extent to which this is happening!

Asset Condition Management versus Asset Health Index

Confusion abounds in language. Have you thought through the constraints of using the language of Asset Health?

Seven Chakras of Asset Management by Terrence O'Hanlon

The seven major asset management chakras run cross-functionally from the specification and design of assets through the asset lifecycle to the decommissioning and disposal of the asset connected through technology

Reliability Leader Fluid Cleanliness Pledge

Fluid Cleanliness is a Reliability Achievement Strategy as well as an asset life extension strategy