We’ve heard many times that people don’t want to change. That may or may not be true. Indeed, Beta has found that people do want to change, if (1) they’re given compelling reasons for change, e.g., building a future for themselves and the company, or avoiding bankruptcy, (2) there’s something in it for them, e.g., a more secure future, less stress and hassle, less personal risk, better pay or rewards, and (3) they participate in creating the changes, e.g., setting up structured improvement time and training, applying the appropriate tools for their needs, removing the obstacles from their success, routinely soliciting their ideas for improvement, and showing gratitude and appreciation for their contribution.

As Margaret Wheatley said, “People own what they create.” Once a compelling reason has been established, facilitating employee participation in defining the specifics of the changes provides them with a sense of ownership and control in the change process. Having a bit of ownership and control is a lot less stressful too! Sustaining that sense of ownership takes time. Winston Ledet’s experience has been that every employee must participate in at least one improvement effort, at least once per year, for at least three years to assure large-scale, lasting, cultural change. The logistics of actually doing this can be daunting. Deming said cultural change takes seven years and requires constancy of purpose. Jim Collins said ten to fifteen. The point is that lasting change takes years, and in fact, we must constantly improve just to remain competitive.

Thus, a process is needed by which the ownership of change is facilitated at the shop floor level. This process must include sufficient funding, time, training, and in some cases a facilitating organization that can be internal, external, or both. Beta has often used external resources to initially facilitate organizational change. As Deming said, “Profound knowledge comes from the outside and by invitation. A system cannot know itself.” However, it’s important that these external resources not be introduced with banners and fanfare. Doing that suggests it’s just another passing fad. The shop floor then acts much like a rock at the seashore: They see the “next wave” coming and just sit tight. This too will pass. The change process must have, as Deming also said, constancy of purpose, and introducing any new tools needs to be done with clear communication about how it supports the company’s overall strategy.

Some might argue that some of the tools are strategies themselves, and they can be, depending on the level in the organization at which they are applied. To determine which is which, first articulate the business strategy and then incorporate the tools that best support the strategy. Otherwise, the tool may drive the strategy instead of the strategy driving the tool.

It’s important to celebrate and build upon the early successes in a low key way, to learn from the early failures (the best learning often comes from failure), and to continue to foster and reward a continuous improvement environment. But, the concept of “low-hanging fruit” is more often than not largely a myth, since the improvement targets are constantly moving. The low-hanging fruit picked today may end up being replaced by other fruit tomorrow, so a process for continuous improvement is essential, always looking for the next opportunity. As in athletics, you have to work really hard just to keep what you have. You have to work even harder to improve. 

Tip from What Tool? When? A Management Guide for Selecting the Right Improvement Tools by Ron Moore

Upcoming Events

August 9 - August 11 2022

MaximoWorld 2022

View all Events
80% of Reliabilityweb.com newsletter subscribers report finding something used to improve their jobs on a regular basis.
Subscribers get exclusive content. Just released...MRO Best Practices Special Report - a $399 value!
“Steel-ing” Reliability in Alabama

A joint venture between two of the world’s largest steel companies inspired innovative approaches to maintenance reliability that incorporate the tools, technology and techniques of today. This article takes you on their journey.

Three Things You Need to Know About Capital Project Prioritization

“Why do you think these two projects rank so much higher in this method than the first method?” the facilitator asked the director of reliability.

What Is Industrial Maintenance as a Service?

Industrial maintenance as a service (#imaas) transfers the digital and/or manual management of maintenance and industrial operations from machine users to machine manufacturers (OEMs), while improving it considerably.

Three Things You Need to Know About Criticality Analysis

When it comes to criticality analysis, there are three key factors must be emphasized.

Turning the Oil Tanker

This article highlights the hidden trap of performance management systems.

Optimizing Value From Physical Assets

There are ever-increasing opportunities to create new and sustainable value in asset-intensive organizations through enhanced use of technology.

Conducting Asset Criticality Assessment for Better Maintenance Strategy and Techniques

Conducting an asset criticality assessment (ACA) is the first step in maintaining the assets properly. This article addresses the best maintenance strategy for assets by using ACA techniques.

Harmonizing PMs

Maintenance reliability is, of course, an essential part of any successful business that wants to remain successful. It includes the three PMs: predictive, preventive and proactive maintenance.

How an Edge IoT Platform Increases Efficiency, Availability and Productivity

Within four years, more than 30 per cent of businesses and organizations will include edge computing in their cloud deployments to address bandwidth bottlenecks, reduce latency, and process data for decision support in real-time.

MaximoWorld 2022

The world's largest conference for IBM Maximo users, IBM Executives, IBM Maximo Partners and Services with Uptime Elements Reliability Framework and Asset Management System is being held Aug 8-11, 2022