By Dan Daley, Author, The Little Black Book Of Reliability Management
Expect what you inspect. ~ An old inspector's saying
Approximately twenty years ago, the company where I was employed sponsored a workshop focusing exclusively on reliability. When the workshop and its subject were announced, I was a little surprised.
Aspen Technology, Inc., the asset optimization software company, today announced the general availability of aspenONE® Version 10 software. The latest Asset Performance Management, Engineering and Manufacturing & Supply Chain software release supports the company’s evolution from process optimization to asset optimization, the next frontier of optimization that makes the best companies even better by driving increased financial return over the entire asset lifecycle.
It is a resounding fact that the
need for advancement in the plant maintenance field gave birth to the
function of reliability. But isn't it about time we disconnect this
child from its umbilical cord and allow the reliability function to
stand on its own feet, independent from maintenance? Shouldn't we now
let this child unleash the true potential it has to offer to the
industry by being an autonomous external entity, focusing on asset
reliability at every level of asset lifecycle management (ALM)?
This article will explain how Archimedes' actions could have been connected to classic failure modes. It goes on to describe experiences on current projects and offer suggestions to improve the reliability of modern process units. More specifically, it will explain and disprove the over-simplification of the graph of Reliability (risk of failure) vs. Time - THE BATHTUB CURVE.
Both companies invited to speak at largest conference dedicated to IBM Maximo users
Orlando, FL – From MaximoWorld 2021, InterPro Solutions, which offers the only suite of mobile solutions designed exclusively for IBM Maximo®, and longtime client Skookum, a nonprofit service provider, announced that they have jointly won a MaximoWorld 2021 Award for “Special Recognition, Best Partnership.”
Today’s market is crowded with hundreds of software systems, each trying to position itself as the perfect maintenance and asset management solution. But, they’re not all created equal. Understanding the difference between an enterprise asset management (EAM) system and a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) and knowing how to tell them apart under all the marketing hype are key to sorting through the herd and finding the asset information system that’s right for your business.
There are those that believe that SAP EAM/PM is a software application that does not provide satisfactory support for the maintenance and reliability work processes that exist within the plant environment. The recent survey of over 700 maintenance managers and reliability professionals conducted by Reliabilityweb.com dispels this belief entirely! In fact 66% of the respondents actually rated SAP EAM/PM as a good to excellent tool for the execution of maintenance activities.
MaintainX today announced $50M in Series C funding led by Bain Capital Ventures (BCV) with participation from existing investors Bessemer Venture Partners, Amity Ventures, August Capital and Ridge Ventures.
[GURNEE, Ill., Nov. 21, 2019] - /PRNewswire/ -- The Dynapar OnSite™ condition monitoring system's latest upgrades offer users more flexibility, compatibility, and adaptability to help successfully anticipate breakdowns and plan maintenance schedules accordingly.
Hindsight is the ability to understand an event or situation only after it has happened. How many times have you witnessed an asset failure and realized during the root cause analysis (RCA) investigation that there were indicators that a catastrophic failure was about to occur? Have we, as maintenance reliability practitioners, become desensitized in their ability to recognize the telltale signs of a failing asset? Is this being accepted as the new normal?