Improve Asset Reliability & Efficiency at MaximoWorld

MaximoWorld 2025: Actionable Insights for Reliability Success.

Sign Up

Please use your business email address if applicable

Using Metrics to Influence Planning and Scheduling Behaviors

Improvement is one reason. For improvement, we need to know where we have been and hopefully, where we want to go. Another is that people like to get a score or feedback on how the organization sees their work. That said, while metrics reflect individual performance, the focus of metrics should be to identify issues with the business processes associated with the work and not the individual themselves. From the metrics, we can identify trends and patterns. Adding to that, consider: "What gets measured gets done. What gets celebrated, gets done well."

Recognize that there are two types of metrics, leading and lagging. Both are useful. To better understand the difference, ask yourself if you are operating within the organization as doctors or coroners? Are you taking a pulse of the organization or performing a postmortem on last month's performance? In most organizations, the reality is that everyone is focused on the postmortems. Often, the reason for the postmortem focus is those numbers are the most readily available from current reports. They are easy to identify and it is the quickest way to satisfy the demand for metrics. Lagging metrics are like looking in the car's rearview mirror; they only tell you where you have been and not where you are headed.

Ideally as a rule of thumb, you should have two leading metrics for every lagging metric. Leading metrics are performance drivers. Utilizing them allows you the opportunity to make preemptive actions to improve your chances of meeting the desired outcomes or lagging metrics. Leading metrics often measure activities or even processes.

Understand that the selected metrics (much like processes, too) the organization chooses to employ will drive employee behavior as well. As an example, one organization chose to measure the number of work orders requiring re-approval if the labor or materials cost exceeded 10% of the original estimate. This measure is a lagging metric because it was after the work had been completed. The reapproval process was designed as a heads-up information sharing activity to show more dollars spent than anticipated. What behaviors did it drive? Planners would significantly overestimate labor hours and contractor/materials costs to avoid the re-approval process. Look at how the domino effect takes hold from there. Those labor hour estimates were used to create the following week's schedule. Now we aren't assigning enough work to the technicians as the hours were padded. Wrench time suffered. As the CMMS was also used as a time clock for payroll purposes, work orders on completed work that were left open became easy targets for technicians or contractors to charge time to when working on other jobs or idle. Materials for other jobs were charged to those work orders as well.

How can we use metrics to drive behaviors? Introducing or revising the organizational metrics requires training for all stakeholders, not just maintenance personnel. Don't assume that the standard metrics that you might take for granted, such as "schedule compliance," are understood by all. Using this metric alone, questions like, "What counts toward the metric?," "When is the cutoff point that items can be added to the schedule and count?" and "What is a scheduled job?" should be addressed from an educational perspective.

Before reviewing specific metrics, it should be noted that variations to the following metrics could be defined or utilized based on your requirements. The listing is not intended to be comprehensive, but to provide insight on specific behaviors related to maintenance planning and scheduling. Let's begin with those metrics directly influenced by the maintenance planning and scheduling function. See the following tables:

table

table

table

table

table

table

The following metrics are more general in nature to the maintenance organization. However, the planning or scheduling role can and often does influence these metrics. Consider the simple metric of "schedule compliance" as an example. If the planner has not correctly identified the materials and parts, or incorrectly estimated the hours required for the job, it may be very difficult to complete the number of jobs that are scheduled. If the scheduler has not coordinated the various crafts and the work cannot be completed in the scheduled window, schedule compliance may be impacted.

table

Are your metrics headed down south or stagnating, not improving? Wondering how to identify the problems or root causes? Do you know the behaviors the metrics are driving? There is a saying from the Six Sigma training world that the "product always follows the process." W. Edwards Deming said, "If your system is not working, don't blame the people, blame the system." To that end, where is your audit program to evaluate if the processes are working? Ideally, you should be pulling three completed work orders off the pile randomly every 30 days as a minimum. Gather the planner scheduler, supervisor, technician(s), storeroom person, and maybe even the plant manager, as examples and walk the jobs. When you get to where the work occurred, you should be stepping through metric type items to determine the process effectiveness. Did the planner scheduler estimate the job duration correctly? Did he or she have the right parts? Were the parts staged and kitted? What about multicraft coordination? Did operations have the equipment ready based on the schedule? Did the job get completed before the due date? Was any follow-up work required? Was the work order completed and closed in a timely fashion? The primary goal is to determine if the business processes worked, but inherently, you can also determine performance issues or the need for training, as examples.

At this point, you may be reflecting on all that you have read and are considering adding to your suite of metrics to bring better focus to your planning and scheduling activities. When selecting metrics, focus on the behaviors you are trying to drive. Keep the number manageable so you are not looped into a state of paralysis by analysis. Strike a balance, as the decision-making process should be driven by leading measures, ideally two to one over lagging metrics. Remember, leading metrics are the ones you can manage, while the lagging metrics tell you the result of how well you managed.

authorJeff Shiver, CMRP, CPMM, is a Managing Principal for People and Processes, Inc., where he has educated and assisted hundreds of people and numerous organizations in implementing the Best Practices for Maintenance and Operations. He is certified in the Maintenance Best Practices and as an RCM2 Practitioner. www.peopleandprocesses.com

Reliability.AITM

You can ask "R.A.I." anything about maintenance, reliability, and asset management.
Start
Quick Time to Value: How to Accelerate ROI in EAM Implementation

Enterprise asset management (EAM) implementation is sometimes misperceived as a complex, resource-intensive endeavor. But that perception is rooted in legacy approaches and outdated systems.

Optimize Operations in 7 Steps: The Strategic Art of Maintenance Planning and Scheduling

Effective maintenance planning and scheduling are essential to prevent unplanned asset failures from dictating your schedules and driving your budgets. In a reactive, unplanned environment, maintenance efforts falter—funds meant for proactive upkeep are instead wasted on waiting for parts, delayed equipment transfers, and emergency fixes that disrupt planned work

Case Study: How Waites Cemented $1 Million in Savings by Eliminating Unplanned Downtime for Buzzi Unicem USA

Minimizing downtime in the cement manufacturing industry is crucial, as each minute of operational delay can lead to significant financial repercussions.

Laying the Groundwork: The Role of Naming Conventions in Spare Parts Management Success

This article outlines best practices for overcoming these hurdles and highlights the foundational elements of a successful spare parts management approach.

Industry 5.0 Is Empowering Today’s Factory Workers and It’s a Long Overdue Revolution

The impacts of Industry 4.0 and its younger sibling, Industry 5.0, fall right down to today’s factory workers. While embedded automation and optimization within the Internet of Things (IoT) and Industry 4.0 have the power to drive new efficiencies, they have also led to the introduction of more complex job roles and tasks, but for fewer frontline workers.

From Data to Action: The Complex Path of Advanced Analytics and Reliability in Industry

In today's industrial landscape, the buzz around advanced analytics is hard to ignore. Companies are increasingly looking to harness the power of data to drive efficiency, reduce downtime, and gain a competitive edge. However, the journey from collecting data to taking actionable steps based on that data is far from straightforward.

Engaging and Retaining the Asset Management Workforce

Employee engagement and retention are critical for the success of asset management organizations. High turnover rates and labor shortages pose significant challenges, impacting operational efficiency, safety and overall workforce morale.

Do or Do Not

Data analysis is critical to understanding problems and decision-making. Analysis that is not followed up by an action is likely a wasted opportunity, but not always.

Achieving Trouble Free Bearing Life Through Defect Elimination

When a machine is designed, one of the major considerations the engineer must make is the selection of proper rolling element bearings. Some of the factors to consider in selecting bearings are shaft speeds, loads (both axial and radial), the environment they will run in, how to relube them, the duty cycle, etc.

Who Does This Belong To?

In today’s fast-paced connected world, you and your organization create an abundance of data. In the past, large corporations with multiple locations relied on in person site visits or information provided by the on-site team for updates to productivity in facilities. But what if there was a way to do this remotely?

Upcoming Events

MaximoWorld 2025

August 4 - 7, 2025
View all Events

Upcoming Workshops

View all Workshops

“R.A.I.” the Reliability.aiTM Chatbot

Start
ChatGPT with
ReliabilityWeb:
Find Your Answers Fast
Start