Intternational Maintenance Conference: The Speed of Reliability

International Maintenance Conference 2025: The Speed of Reliability

Sign Up

Please use your business email address if applicable

reliability engineering for maintenance

 The RELIABILITY Conference Offers Insight and Education for Reliability Leaders and Asset Managers

The RELIABILITY Conference Offers Insight and Education for Reliability Leaders and Asset Managers

Reliabilityweb.com® and Uptime® Magazine, trusted names in asset management, have planned a noteworthy schedule for The RELIABILITY Conference™, co-located with the Maintenance 4.0 Digitalization Forum, scheduled for May 6-10 at the Hyatt Regency Bellevue on Seattle’s Eastside. The RELIABILITY Conference is the foremost conference for reliability and asset management professionals worldwide.

Uptime Elements

Uptime Elements

Terrence O'Hanlon, CEO & President

Reliabilityweb.com & Uptime Magazine

Reliability Is Not a Destination. It’s a Continuous Journey

Reliability Is Not a Destination. It’s a Continuous Journey

This presentation will explore the concept that equipment reliability is not a goal to be achieved and then pat yourself on the back and walk away.

Black Belt Program

Black Belt Program

Terrence O'Hanlon, CEO & President
Reliabilityweb.com & Uptime Magazine

banner
A weekly collection of recommended articles and videos to boost your reliability journey. Right in your inbox
DOWNLOAD NOW
 Reliablityweb.com Joins the Industrial Internet Consortium

Reliablityweb.com Joins the Industrial Internet Consortium

Rapid growth in automated asset condition management drives technology diffusion.

Taking Notice of the Telltale Signs

Taking Notice of the Telltale Signs

Hindsight is the ability to understand an event or situation only after it has happened. How many times have you witnessed an asset failure and realized during the root cause analysis (RCA) investigation that there were indicators that a catastrophic failure was about to occur? Have we, as maintenance reliability practitioners, become desensitized in their ability to recognize the telltale signs of a failing asset? Is this being accepted as the new normal?

Designing for Reliability

Designing for Reliability

TRC-2018 Rap Talk - 18:52

by Ramesh Gulati, Jacobs

Most of the asset fail during operation, or defects which cause failures, get detected during the operational phase. What and who cause these failures? Is it operations (operators) and/or maintenance? In the past, maintenance and sometimes operations got blamed for these failures. Are they solely responsible? In recent years, we have learned that majority of asset failures are caused by defects which are introduced during the design, procurement, build/fabrication, and installation, also known as acquisition phase. It is much more economical to correct these defects at early stages to design/build assets for reliable operations. This is what we call Designing for Reliability. This RAP Talk suggests that little more investing during the acquisition phase can reduce failures as well as the total cost of ownership.

Estimating Availability and Reliability Using FEM Maximo to Assist Reliability Centered Maintenance

Estimating Availability and Reliability Using FEM Maximo to Assist Reliability Centered Maintenance

IMC-2017 Learning Session 34:12
by Robert C Patev, US Army Corps of Engineers

The USACE is starting a pilot program to coordinate their Facility Equipment Maintenance (FEM) Maximo database for use in better understanding their current and future routine and non-routine maintenance practices throughout their large portfolio of Civil Works projects. With a stagnation of the USACE maintenance budgets over the past 10 years and an aging and deteriorating infrastructure, the investment strategies to maximize and stretch maintenance dollars are critical to maintain the availability and reliability of USACE Civil Works projects. This reliability is important to maintain the value that the USACE projects provided to the nation.

As part of these pilots, the USACE has started to link their FEM Maximo database with a Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS) program called Availability Workbench (AWB) to examine the links to the reliability of their complex systems. Fault trees have been constructed for the pilot projects based on a hierarchy of components and subsystems that are parallel to the FEM Maximo database. AWB is being utilized to examine and process the existing data records for both maintenance, repair, replacement and failure of components and subsystems in the fault trees. Weibayes analyses is conducted using the FEM Maximo data to update the baseline Weibull curves for many of the fault tree components. AWB is then able to analyze these systems for various maintenance scenarios and the final results can be examined to show the optimal maintenance for these systems. The results from a USACE FEM Maximo and AWB pilot will be shown as part of the presentation.

Reliability Centered Operations: Lessons Learned from In-House Implementation

Reliability Centered Operations: Lessons Learned from In-House Implementation

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 31:18
by Paul Hughes and Walter Sanford, PinnacleART

Facilities that are not prepared to perform full Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) analysis can still benefit by employing reliability methodologies to Operations and Maintenance (O&M) tasks. Operating costs for water and wastewater treatment plants can run between 50 and 75 percent of the total lifecycle cost of the facility. When operating costs, maintenance supplies, labor, energy, and downtime are included, O&M costs over the lifetime of a facility can reach up to 85 percent of total lifecycle costs. Optimizing O&M practices can dramatically impact the lifecycle costs associated with a facility. Apparently minor increases in efficiency will aggregate over time to make a significant difference in lifecycle costs. This presentation describes a two-stage O&M improvement initiative at two wastewater facilities experiencing significant operational problems and early asset failures. These facilities were heavily staffed to be able to manage issues, yet staff were underutilized for much of the time. These issues resulted in continually increasing costs for owners, and increasing challenges to meeting facility requirements. In the first stage of improvement, using the principles of RCM, O&M management was focused more on reliability-based and proactive tasks rather than reactive maintenance and “firefighting” failures and other issues. In the second stage, a full, risk-based RCM analysis was performed and implemented, along with further improvements in O&M management. By focusing on reliability, and risk-based Asset Management, these facilities experienced rapid, significant, and sustained improvement in availability, regulatory compliance, and cost performance.

Reliability Is Not a Destination. It’s a Continuous Journey

Reliability Is Not a Destination. It’s a Continuous Journey

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 37:33
by Randy Carlisle, Airgas Merchant Gases

This presentation will explore the concept that equipment reliability is not a goal to be achieved and then pat yourself on the back and walk away. Rather it’s an ongoing process requiring continuous review, re-evaluation, and evolving maintenance strategies to ensure your maintenance program meets your changing business and equipment needs.

  • Business models and business strategies evolve with time. Yesterday’s priorities may not be the same today.
  • Both short-term and long-term needs must be accounted for in the maintenance strategy
  • The most probable failure modes change over the life of the equipment and process conditions can change from year to year causing unforeseen changes in failure modes. Maintenance strategies must evolve to match the new failure modes
  • Aging is a reality and older equipment may need a different strategy than new equipment. Overhaul doesn’t equal new and plans for equipment replacement must be added to the maintenance strategy
  • It can take years to see the benefit of a maintenance strategy. Understanding these concepts allows maintenance changes to be proactive and have new processes in place as real word changes occur.
What Do Recent Changes to Electrical Safety Standards Mean to YOU?

What Do Recent Changes to Electrical Safety Standards Mean to YOU?

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 42:32
by Tim Rohrer, Exiscan

NFPA 70E and CSA Z462 are (arguably) the two most influential electrical safety standards in the world. The changes contained in the recent 2018 revisions of these harmonized standards have a direct impact on Electrical Preventive Maintenance (EPdM) practices, and likely have a direct impact on your facility(s). Likewise, the standard used throughout the world for arc flash hazard calculation (IEEE 1584) is in the final stages of revisions based on recent research on the subject. This presentation will highlight some of the changes that carry the biggest impact for Electrical Preventive Maintenance, and will answer the questions:

  • What changes to electrical safety standards should I be aware of?
  • What impact do those changes have on the EPdM work practices and design principles at my facility(s)?
  • What steps can I take upon returning to improve the worker safety and regulatory compliance at my facility(s)?
Putting the Fun Back in Functional Processes

Putting the Fun Back in Functional Processes

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 30:15
by David Auton, C&W Services

Common approaches to maintenance improvement include Failure Mode Effects Analysis and Root Cause Analysis. Most improvement projects are considered as individual and isolated. Understanding how your maintenance organization operates in a complex system of people and machines with needs and desires will help in your maintenance planning approach. Why does fixing one problem result in finding more problems? Why do the solutions tend to become more and more complex? There are really only three responses to any root cause; understanding these responses and how to manage them will provide more control over the improvement program. This presentation is based on System Thinking approaches to problem-solving.

Designing for Reliability

Designing for Reliability

TRC-2018 RAP Talk 18:52
by Ramesh Gulati, Jacobs

Most of the asset fail during operation, or defects which cause failures, get detected during the operational phase. What and who cause these failures? Is it operations (operators) and/or maintenance? In the past, maintenance and sometimes operations got blamed for these failures. Are they solely responsible? In recent years, we have learned that a majority of asset failures are caused by defects which are introduced during the design, procurement, build/fabrication, and installation, also known as acquisition phase. It is much more economical to correct these defects at early stages to design/build assets for reliable operations. This is what we call Designing for Reliability. This RAP Talk suggests that little more investing during the acquisition phase can reduce failures as well as the total cost of ownership.

How RCM Helps to Change the Maintenance Culture

How RCM Helps to Change the Maintenance Culture

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 41:46
by Nick Jize, JMS Software

We will discuss the classical RCM methodology and its role in teaching the maintenance department how to critically evaluate Maintenance PM tasks, achieve buy-in for recommended changes, and to effectively implement new Job Plans.

From Mentoring to Monetizing: The 4 Conversations You Need to Have for an Effective PdM Program

From Mentoring to Monetizing: The 4 Conversations You Need to Have for an Effective PdM Program

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 38:10
by Sean O'Connor, JLL

Let’s face it, having conversations can be difficult. They can be especially difficult when discussions fall outside of our comfort zones. For instance, information technology and finance may not be at the center of our day to day world, but as the Industrial Internet of Things progresses these areas will play a larger role in our success. Great communicators have this seemly innate ability to shape and contour their message depending on who they are talking to, all the while not changing their principal intent. Managing a Predictive Maintenance Program is no different. For example, a single defect highlighted on a vibration report could trigger a series of conversations across our organization. All of those conversations will have a common theme, but the focus will shift in order to resonate with whom we are actively engaged with at that time. We will discuss the importance of building leadership capital and how we can improve our PdM Program by knowing how and when to cash it in. From there we will talk through the importance of understanding how expectations and perspective play a role in gaining widespread participation. There are 4 key conversations that can help you shift from individual contributor to force multiplier.

How Design for Reliability Honors the Stakeholders in the Field

How Design for Reliability Honors the Stakeholders in the Field

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 40:40
by Marie Getsug, Jacobs

Asset Management has introduced a few key concepts which require a shift from focusing on initial investment to optimizing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). The is rooted in a risk-based and science-based approach to understanding the requirements of the assets throughout the useful life. The risk-based approach drives prioritization and optimization; whereas, the science-based approach honors the Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) experience as well as seeking meaningful data to drive decisions. Shifting from a mindset of initial cost, scope and schedule to a focus on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) requires a catalyst for change. Design for Reliability (DfR) answers this call. Recognizing the Stakeholder SMEs by capturing their perspectives, recommendations and experience in a Design for Reliability (DfR) Toolkit is one way to positively affect both the leakage from CapEx to OpEx and the results of Capital Engineering Projects. Building the timely activities and requirements applied at each of the DfR stage gates, by formally incorporating the contributions of each Stakeholder, fuels the results and enthusiasm for DfR and Capital Engineering Projects. Celebrate the perspectives of Stakeholders by discovering their contributions.

Continuous Monitoring of Critical Valves, Leading to Predictive Maintenance

Continuous Monitoring of Critical Valves, Leading to Predictive Maintenance

TRC-2018 Learning Zone 39:16
by David Anderson, Score Diagnostics Limited

100% Valve Reliability (optimisation of valve performance over time, for minimum investment, with no surprises) is our vision for your valves. Since the year 2000, Score have been working with valve diagnostics equipment and systems to improve valves’ operating performance and reliability, dependent upon their criticality to the process. This track record has allowed us as a valve management company, to identify and develop strategies which optimise process operations and reliability. Being exposed to all of the failure modes in all of the valve designs and types commonly found in process plants throughout the world has shown us what to look for in terms of performance indicators that lead to in-service failures. Consequently, the ability to identify any/all emerging failure modes as early as possible delivers an operational reliability advantage. So, what we are interested in is, can we see and quantify any developing failure mode at any time, through a continuous condition and performance monitoring approach? What is that failure mode going to do to your process? And at what point do we want to make an intervention in terms of our valve management strategy? The most commonly deployed maintenance strategies lead to calendar-based interventions, so we are going to demonstrate new ways of working, to achieve better outcomes. We shall challenge the audience’s thinking on commonly applied maintenance management strategies and focus their attention on maximizing efficiency through an evidence-based approach to reliability centered maintenance. To support this, we shall present a real-life case study where the evidence from condition and performance monitoring of valves can be used to safely extend the MTBMI (Mean Time Between Maintenance Interventions) for critical valves in a gas distribution network. The results of course are minimised production downtime, minimised risks to process and personnel and greater efficiencies in operations.

Reliability Operators

Reliability Operators

IMC-2017 Learning Session 49:16
by Ernest Newmes, Stepan Company.

Stepan is a chemical company producing specialty and intermediate chemicals such as surfactants, polymers, and other specialty products. Stepan Company has been maturing its Reliability program by developing all roles within the company to understand their part in Reliability.

Production Operator participation in Reliability is frequently referred to as Operator Driven Reliability or Autonomous Maintenance. Operators are integrally involved in operating equipment and have a unique opportunity, when equipped with tools and knowledge, to improve Reliability. Their frequent presence and familiarity of equipment can be leveraged to recognize equipment issues earlier in the P-F interval and operate them effectively. Audio, visual, and olfactory (AVO) indications are fundamental to heading off major equipment issues. Local and remote sensors are also used to recognize issues earlier on the P-F interval. In addition to having a presence, basic knowledge of equipment operation and function is essential to operating equipment within its operating envelop. Operating by procedure reduces the human impact on operations.

The topics covered will include:

  • Overview of Operator Rounds at Stepan:
    • Development of Rounds
    • AVO
    • Sensors/Visual Aides
    • Electronic Rounds
    • Activity Feedback
  • Developing Operator Knowledge
    • New Operator Training
    • Knowledge “roadshow” for experienced operators
  • Operating by Procedure
    • Procedures that need diligence for a successful outcome
    • Development of critical procedures
    • Electronic Procedure
    • Activity Feedback
 October - November 2018

October - November 2018

Click to read all articles from this issue. You can also download the full PDF.

Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO): Building on the Success of Worker Engagement

Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO): Building on the Success of Worker Engagement

IMC-2017 Learning Session  40:28
by Paul Durko, Consolidated Nuclear Security (CNS) Y-12.

Over the past several years a leveraged approach to re-establishing the maintenance history, feedback, and improvement process has reaffirmed the management and technician relationship required to build a sustainable effort. While not a perfect process, the technicians realize that there is a commitment to ensuring their efforts are acted upon which in turn has reignited the sense of asset ownership at the floor level.

This effort, a topic of a previous IMC presentation, became the springboard to the next initiative; Preventive Maintenance Optimization (PMO). The PMO effort has been implemented in key Production areas of the plant since 2015. Due to complexity of work execution in the Operating Environment the effort was implemented in two phases.

Phase I – Team Synergy, Work Instruction Standardization, Task Validation – Expansion of Task Instruction and Parts Identification
Phase II – System Performance Trending, Task Optimization, Continuous Improvement, Expansion of Condition Based Maintenance Activities

ChatGPT with
ReliabilityWeb:
Find Your Answers Fast
Start